Page 61 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 61

CPS2184 M Lutfor Rahman
            well  as  cross-sectional  version  of  the  dynamic  network  logistic  regression
            described in Almquist and Butts (2014).

                Adjacency Matrices of Index and Contacts and Their Cofactor Matrices
                We define the adjacency matrices of response variable originated from the
            interaction of index and contacts along with the risk factors connected to index
            and contacts in the network, of where 1 denotes infected and 0 denotes not
            infected and in the covariance related adjacency matrices 1 denotes presence
            of the characteristics and 0 denotes absence of that characteristics or in the
            case of continuous variable, just value of the covariate has been placed in the
            point  of  intersection  of  an  index  and  contacts.  The  following  algebraic
            notations have been presented to illustrate the ongoing discussion:










            where  is an adjacency response matrix,  is an ith covariate associated with
            index               or              contacts;                           =


            1,2, … … … … …  . Now the network logit model can be defined as follows
            where β1,β2,…..,βi,……….βp are model parameters and is an error term. In the
            current study, the order of adjacency matrix is 495 x 495 as there are 69 index
            patients and 426 contacts.
                In the analysis, two statistical software were used: SPSS 20 to produce all
            the initial results (univariate and bivariate) as well as to model binary multiple
            and hierarchical logistic regressions; R, particularly igraph and SNA packages,
            for  the  network  matrices  and  for  the  network  logistic  regression
            implementation. The igraph and SNA packages comprise a range of tools for
            social  network  analysis,  including  node  and  graph-level  indices,  structural
            distance and covariance methods, structural equivalence detection, network
            regression, random graph generation, and 2D/3D network visualization [17].
            Statistical  significance  was  set  to  0.05  and  we  followed  stepwise  forward
            selection  procedure  for  all  three  logistic  models  to  identify  significant
            variables.

            3.  Result
                Comparison of Multiple, Hierarchical and Network Logistic Regressions
            This  section  presents  crude  (simple  logistic),  adjusted  (multiple  logistic),
            hierarchical (mixed logistic), and network logistic regression odds ratio and
            their  corresponding  confidence  intervals.  Focused  on  infected  status

                                                                50 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66