Page 159 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 1
P. 159

STS422 Robin G. et al.
            demonstrates  that  older  adults  have  a  signifcantly  higher  proportion  of
            passive accounts than youth across most provinces of Cambodia.
                Among the key reasons for the large proportion of passive savings account
            are:  customers’  limited  awareness  of  savings  opportunities;  low  financial
            literacy;  limited  access  points  in  rural  areas;  and  the  attractiveness  and
            convenience of informal savings.
                For  example, nearly 60 percent of  adults are unaware of formal saving
            methods, 54 percent cannot reach a bank within 30 minutes, and 33 percent
            of the adult population saves informally. Moreover only  10 percent of the
            people save to engage in business or farming activities, indicating that these
            activities deliver higher returns than savings in the bank (UNCDF  Finscope
            2015).
                On  the  supply  side,  credit-linked  savings  accounts  are  often  opened
            merely  to  function  as  repayment  vehicles  for  loans.  In  addition,  staff  and
            customer incentive systems are geared towards improving savings access and
            not savings usage. Savings products are not linked to regular income streams,
            such as wages and pensions. In fact, 92 percent of people receive their income
            in cash, rather than directly into their bank account and it remains challenging
            for depositors to make payments or transfer remittance from their savings
            accounts, especially in rural areas.
                On the credit side, survival analysis finds that customers have a limited
            borrowing relationship with FSPs; 39 percent of the borrowers exited the loan
            programme after the first year and 78 percent of borrowers exited within three
            years. Women, youth and rural customers are more loyal borrowers, yet they
            receive lower individual loans than men and older adults respectively. We also
            find strong differences in exit rates among FSPs, varying as much as 24 percent
            between the top performing and the weakest performing FSP, which indicate
            that borrower exit is at least partly under the control of the FSP and not just
            an issue of competition and market saturation (Mimosa, 2016). In some cases,
            borrowers may exit because they have become financially self-sufficient and
            do not require further loans. However, high exit rates also suggest that loan
            products  are  not  tailored  to  the  needs  of  borrowers  (Churchill,  C.,  and  S.
            Halpern 2001; Copestake 2002 ).
                There  is  a  business  case  for  FSPs  to  strengthen  customer  journeys,
            especially among women and youth. Depositors staying for five years with
            FSPs  saved  nearly  4.5  times  more  than  the  level  of  their  average  opening
            balances  ($174  compared  with  $820  in  savings  account  balances)  and  1.8
            times more than short-term depositors staying for a year ($453 compared with
            $820). Long-term borrowers who stayed with the FSP for three years also took
            up slightly larger loans ($613) compared with those who stay with the FSP for
            one year ($521). We estimate that reducing the number of passive savings
            accounts by between 10 percent and 30 percent, would mobilize an additional



                                                               148 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164