Page 277 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 1
P. 277

STS429 Margarita R.
            representation  of  several  distinctive  areas  of  human  life  (economic,  social,
            environmental), but also show the correlations between those areas, while at
            the  same  time  providing  a  balanced  and  representative  illustration  of  the
            fundamental aspects of the “greenification” process.

            4.  Critique of the green economy
                Civil  society  groups  and  governments  are  critical  of  the  transition  to a
            green economy, taking into account that it does not adequately or clearly
            address  the  social,  economic  and  ecological  aspects,  pillars  of  sustainable
            development  (Geng  et  al.,  2017).  On  the  contrary,  it  can  become  a  new
            framework for sustainable development, replacing the three pillars mentioned
            (Loiseau  et  al., 2016).  From  the  United Nations Environment  Program,  it  is
            stated that “the achievement of sustainability depends considerably on the
            adequacy of the economy”, which makes it necessary to examine the concept
            of a green economy and the way in which the concept of a green economy
            would promote economic, ecological and social sustainability within this.
                Another criticism that appears is the economistic character of the green
            economy,  which,  although  based  on  the  production  of  more  sustainable
            sectors which reduce environmental problems, continues to have an economic
            pattern of accumulation and infinite growth (Lander, 2011; Karakul, 2016). For
            Droste et al. (2016), overcoming the current economic order, would imply the
            need  to  convert  economic  production  to  physical  terms,  so  that  the  finite
            capacity of natural resources and assimilation of the waste of human activity
            on the planet becomes evident.
                Unmüßig et al. (2012) and Diyar et al. (2014), state that the green economy
            is an inappropriate term, scientific and philosophical misunderstanding, which
            will not achieve sustainable development and the eradication of poverty. Also
            Montefrio & Dressler (2016) add that it was created from ambiguities, without
            scientific or philosophical support, and that on the contrary it will legitimize
            the opening of markets, create more tension with the ecological and cultural
            diversity of the planet and of humanity.

            5.  Conclusion
                The  green  economy  becomes  a  model  which  promotes  growth,  the
            creation of income and jobs, in particular “green jobs”, which seeks to generate
            a change in the interaction between economic progress and environmental
            sustainability, mostly if wealth is measured account for natural assets and not
            just productivity. In addition, the green economy also contributes substantially
            to reducing social inequality among countries and eradicating poverty in the
            world.
                It should be noted that the implementation of the green economy can
            achieve technological changes, which allow the adoption of environmentally

                                                               266 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282