Page 229 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 229

STS541 Masao T. et al.
            Tabulation on Industries” for the 2010 Population Census. The results of the
            tabulation were released from the end of May to mid-July 2011.
                In addition, to make it easier to use statistical data on disaster-stricken
            areas, the SBJ extracted the major statistical indices of the affected areas from
            the municipal statistical database of the System of Social and Demographic
            Statistics of Japan, and published a summary data sheet including data on the

            earthquake damage, on the website of the SBJ.
                To make it easy for anyone to find and use this information, the SBJ set up
            a dedicated webpage on the SBJ website, on which information related to the
            Great  East  Japan  Earthquake  along  with  various  statistical  data  and
            information on disaster areas were posted.

            5.  Statistical Analyses on the Effects of the Earthquake
                Statistical results after the earthquake allowed us to understand the effects
            of the disaster on society and the economy and the situation of recovery. For
            this reason, the SBJ released commentaries on useful findings whenever new
            statistics became available. Some examples are as follows.
                As the first example, the statistics of the “Report on Internal Migration in
            Japan” revealed that the earthquake had a significant impact on the flow of
            the population of the Tohoku Three Prefectures, and published a report that
            analyzed the characteristics of the population migration during three months
            and six months after the earthquake. The analysis has been continued for the
            region (Figure 2).

























                Figure 2 Surplus of incoming population over outgoing population of
              Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures (Japanese migrant) (1954~2018)

                The second example is based on the Economic Census conducted in 2009
            and 2012. The results revealed how the number of establishments (Figure 3)


                                                               218 |I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234