Page 47 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 47

CPS2176 Chiraz KARAMTI et al.
            on the basis of root mean square error (RMSE) and absolute mean error (AME)
            are also reported in Table 3. When looking at the two sub periods depicted in
            Table 3, we can see that on average the forecast error of the three EGARCH
            models decreased significantly in higher scales (long-run) compared to lower
            scales (short-run). Specially, after Brexit, it is obvious that the uncertainty is
            higher, so a longer-term forecast seems more reliable (d6 and d7). It follows
            that a forecast at a period of high volatility is better in the long run and that
            the  accuracy  of  the  euro/dollar  exchange  rate  forecast  depends  on  the
            frequency of the data.

               Tableau 1.    The AIC, RMSE and MAE comparisons for different EGARCH
                                                models

                      Full sample            Before Brexit             After Brexit
                  α      γ      β       α        γ         β       α        γ      β
                                          ***
                           ***
                 0.0017   0.0212   0.3253   -0.0048    0.0408    0.0203    -0.0422    0.0110    0.0165
                    ***
                                  ***
                                                   ***
                                                                     ***
                                                             ***
                                                                              ***
                           ***
                                                                              ***
                    ***
                                                                                     ***
                                          ***
                                                    ***
                                                                     ***
                                  ***
                 0.0136   0.0235   0.2020   0.0818    -0.0047    0.0645   -0.0115    0.0360   0.1916
                                          ***
                                                   ***
                                                                              ***
                    ***
                           ***
                                  ***
                 0.1719   0.0587   0.9264   0.0401    0.0140    0.0924   -0.0007   0.0121    0.0613
                                          ***
                                                             ***
                    ***
                                                                     ***
                                  ***
                                                                                     ***
                 0.2768   -0.0001  0.9834   0.2798    -0.0004   0.9807    0.2758    0.0001   0.9741
                                  ***
                                                             ***
                                                                     ***
                                          ***
                                                                                     ***
                    ***
                 0.2743   0.0011  0.9783   0.2936    -0.0012   0.9737    0.2686    0.0018   0.9696
                                          ***
                                  ***
                    ***
                                                                                     ***
                                                                     ***
                                                             ***
                 0.2580   0.0004  0.9596   0.2058    0.0005   0.9656    0.2721    8.15E-05  0.9582
                                                                     ***
                                          ***
                                                             ***
                 0.1156   -0.0061   0.3188   0.1937    -0.0004   0.9721    0.1866    -0.00003  0.9625
                           ***
                    ***
                                                                                     ***
                                  ***

            5.  Discussion and Conclusion
                This paper proposes the application of the Wavelet-EGARCH technique for
            the  modelling  of  euro/dollar  exchange  rate  series.  The  MODWT-EGARCH
            models  are  obtained  by  combining  two  methods,  an  EGARCH  model  and
            discrete wavelet transforms. The main objective is to verify if the frequency of
            the data would have an impact on the reliability of the forecasts. Accordingly,
            the series was decomposed at 7 decomposition levels (10mn until one day).
            The sum of the effective details and the approximation component were used
            as inputs to the EGARCH model. The performance of the proposed MODWT-
            EGARCH  models  was  compared  to  forecasting  using  regular  criteria.
            Comparison of the results indicated that the MODWT-EGARCH model was
            substantially more accurate in higher scales, i.e. the medium and long-terms.
            This  study  shows  that  wavelet  transform  technique,  joined  with  GARCH
            models,  are  particularly  useful  in  forecasting  foreign  exchange  volatility  in
            periods of either low or high volatility. Indeed, forecasts seem less reliable in
            periods characterized by greater uncertainty, in our case due to the Brexit
            announcement.  Thus,  over  a  period  of  high  volatility,  a  long-term  scale  is
            found to be the most effective in yielding an accurate forecast, whereas before
            Brexit, the best forecast is given by medium-term wavelets. In all cases a short-
            term forecast has proved unreliable.
                Finally, the frequency component affects the predictive performance of
            various  models  at  both  short  horizons  and  long  horizons.  The  volatility
            dynamics  are  not  uniform  across  scales.  Accordingly,  as  might  have  been
                                                                36 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52