Page 214 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 214
STS540 J.-C. Malela-Majika et al.
Graham (2007) for a discussion on the and Ou, Chen and Khoo (2015) for
a discussion on the ). Both were considered as the measures the
control chart’s performance for specific shifts, whereas the measures the
overall performance of the control chart. Only the latter is shown here to
conserve space. The proposed methods are compared to the traditional
methods and the chart with the lower performs best. It was found that
for the SRR2-of-(h+1) scheme, the proposed control schemes perform better than
the traditional control schemes for any ℎ value regardless of the sample size
for both zero-state and steady-state modes. For the IRR2-of-(h+1) schemes, for
both zero-state and steady-state modes, the proposed BTXII control schemes
are slightly more sensitive than the IRR2-of-(h+1) traditional control schemes (see
Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3. The BTXII X control schemes versus the traditional X control
schemes (SRR2-of-(h+1) schemes for different values of ℎ) under zero-
state and steady-state modes when n = 5 and 10
203 |I S I W S C 2 0 1 9