Page 95 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 95

STS517 Zaoli C. et al.
            Even  though  we  are  using  the  same  notation  T  for  operators  acting  on
            different spaces, the meaning will always be clear from the context. Note that
            each individual left shift  on (ℤ , ℬ(ℤ ),  ) is measure preserving (because
                                                  ℕ 
                                           ℕ 
                                                       
                    ()
            each (  )    is an invariant measure.) It is also conservative and ergodic by
                      ∈ℤ
                                                                                 
            Theorem 4.5.3 in Aaronson (1997). Therefore, the group action  = { :   ∈
            ℤ } is conservative, ergodic and measure preserving on (, ℇ, ).
              
                Equipped with a measure preserving group action on the space (, ℰ) we
            can now define a stationary symmetric α-stable random field by
            (2.5)                        = ∫ ο ()(),  ∈ ℤ ,
                                                    
                                                                    
                                         
                                              
            where  is a  random measure on(, ℰ)  with control measure µ, and
            (2.6)               () = 1( ()  ∈ ,  = 1, … , ),  = ( (1) , … ,  () ).

            where  = { ∈ ℤ ∶  = 0}. Clearly,  ∈  (),  which  guarantees  that  the
                             ℤ
                                                      ∝
                                  0
            integral in (2.5)  is well defined. We refer  the reader to Samorodnitsky and
            Taqqu (1994) for general information on stable processes and integrals with
            respect  to  stable  measures,  and  to  Rosiński  (2000)  on  more  details  on
            stationary stable random fields and their representations.
                The  random  field  model  defined  by  (2.5)  is  attractive  because  the  key
            parameters involve in its definition have a clear intuitive meaning: the index of
            stability 0 < α < 2 is responsible for the heaviness of the tails, while 0 <  <
                                                                                    
            1,  = 1, … ,  (defined in (2.2)) are responsible for the “length of the memory”.
            The  latter  claim  is  not  immediately  obvious,  but  its  (informal)  validity  will
            become clearer in the sequel.
                The following array of positive numbers will play the crucial role in the
            extremal limit theorems in this paper. Denote for  = 1, 2, …. and  = 1, … , 

                           ()                                       1/
                             = ( ({x:  = 0 for some  = 0, 1, … , n}))  ,
                                  
                                        
            and let


            Then  = ( ), where
                   
                   
                          
               = {x = (x (1) , … , x (d) ) ∈ :  ()  = 0 for some 0 ≤  ≤  , each  = 1, … , }.
                                                                
                                                                     
               
                                            
            Therefore, we can define, for each  ∈ ℕ ,  a probability measures   on (, ℇ)
                                                   
                                                   
                                                                             n
            by
            (2.8)                            (∙) =  n − (∙ ∩ _ ).
                                             n
            This probability measure allows us to represent the restriction of the stationary
            SαS random field  in (2.5) to the hypercube [, ] = { ≤  ≤ } as a series,
            described below, and that we will find useful in the sequel. It is useful to note
            also that the measure    is the product measure of  probability measures
                                    

                                                                84 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100