Page 45 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6
P. 45

CPS1484 Neela A Gulanikar et al.
                            Table 2: Number of Rejections under Different Settings
              Method  Year         Minor      Moderate  Major        No Change
                                   Change     Change      Change
              MF       2008-2010          41        240       1000             54
              MF       2008-2017          57       1000       1000             55
              GMF      2008-2010          39        128       1000             29
              GMF      2008-2017           7        112       1000             92
              HMF      2008-2010         134        158       1000            150
              HMF      2008-2017         137        249       1000            172

            4. Discussion and Conclusions
               The above results show that the parametric bootstrap based test performs
            quite well. In the case of MF, the test always maintains its level. The level is
            pretty much maintained for GMF as well. As far as power is concerned, the test
            does well for all the marriage functions. From the three different parameter
            combinations reported over here, it is clear that the test has good power for
            reasonably distant alternative. This test can further be extended for detecting
            the  changes  in  the  marriage  rates  across  age-groups,  income  levels  etc.
            Further,  as  and  when  the  real  data  become  available,  we  may  be  able  to
            develop  methods  for  choosing  appropriate  and  more  flexible  marriage
            functions,  e.g.  the  GMF  and  HMF  can  respectively  be  modified  by  using
            weighted GMF and weighted HMF respectively. The weights for the same may
            be  chosen  by  comparing  the  fitted  values  obtained  by  different  weights.
            Development of such methodologies will then result in a better understanding
            of  marriage  patterns  and  may  lead  to  better  prediction  of  changes  in  the
            demographic patterns which is especially essential for a developing country
            like India having huge population.

            References
            1.  Hadeler  K.,  Waldstatter  R.,  Worz-Busekros  A.,  (1988),  Models  for  pair
               formation in bisexual populations, Journal of Mathematical Biology, (26),
               635-649.
            2.  Fredrickson, A., (1971), A mathematical theory of age structure in sexual
               populations:  Random  mating  and  monogamous  marriage  models.
               Math.Biosciences, (10), 117-143.
            3.  Kendall,  D.,  (1949),  Stochastic  processes  and  population  growth.
               Roy.Statist.Soc., Ser B, (2) , 230-264.
            4.  Keytz, N., (1972), The mathematics of sex and marriage. Proc. of the Sixth
               Berkeley, Symposion on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Biology
               and Health, 89-108



                                                                34 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50