Page 93 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6
P. 93

CPS1832 Nur Fazliana Rahim et al.
            and allow fuzzy sets to be related with different linguistic variables associated.
            The relative weight,   for linguistic term  , with regard to classification  is:
                                                      i



            where (,  )[0,1]and   =  1, 2, . . . ,  . Thus, the compound weight () and
                         
            () of the weighted conjunction of linguistic terms related with it can be
            obtained as follows;










            where A is the conditional attribute and the compound weight is (), ∇ is the
            t-norm,   ,   =  1, 2, . . .,  , are the linguistic terms of variable  which are
                      
            conjunctively  combined  and    is  the  largest  amongst  the    associated
            weight,  (,   ).  Similarly,  the  compound  weight  ()  of  the  weighted
                           
            disjunction of linguistic  terms associated with variable , where Δ  is the t-
            conorm and   ,   =  1, 2, . . .,  , are the linguistic terms of variable B, which
                          
            are disjunctively combined.
                    Fifth,  the  WSBA  then  used  the  weighted  conjunction  ()  and
            weighted disjunction () to generate fuzzy rules.
            C. Part 3: Finalize the Classification Output
                    The classification of FER rank can be performed when the rule set and
            the study over the three conditional attributes are acquired. Then, using rule
            set generated and the transform fuzzy values, the rules were calculated. the
            Min-Max Operator is used in this part.
            D. Part 4: Rule set Testing for the Classification Tasks
                    The training dataset, FER-1 using rule set for classification of FER rank
            were then tested using the FER-2 dataset. The identified trend for each of the
            FER data were based on the classification of the rules. The FER distribution
            was started to forecast when each of the FER data had been classified by the
            rule and trend of forecasting.

            3. Result
               The analysis performed in this research were discusses in this section. Table
            I below depicted the forecast value obtained by using prior method and the
            current approach. The FER-1 dataset are tested using the rule set trained for
            classification of Foreign Exchange Rate where the FER-2 dataset is used for
            testing. The difference between forecasting methods was illustrates in Fig. 1.




                                                                82 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98