Page 120 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 1
P. 120

IPS102 Ilja K. K. et al.
                      The  adjustments  made  to  the  coverage  of  wealthy  households,  as
                  expected, produce higher estimates of inequality. The impact is particularly
                  high  in  Italy  which  is  also  not  applying  any  oversampling  in  the  HFCS.  In
                  France,  Italy  and  Germany  accounting  for  under-reporting  of  non-rich
                  households  indicates  that  a  pure  Pareto  method  may  overestimate  wealth
                  inequality,  and  emphasizes  the  need  for  adjustments  in  all  parts  of  the
                  distribution. Counter-intuitively, the hybrid method leads to highest inequality
                  estimates in Finland. However, in Finland ownership of most assets is derived
                  from  administrative  sources  and  the  hurdle  method  may  actually  bias  the
                  results,  given  that  Finnish  administrative  data  sources  produce  reliable
                  information on whether households own certain assets or not.

                       Table 1. The share of wealth held by the richest 10% of households
                                        according to various methods
                                               France       Italy     Germany      Finland
                    Base survey                 49.4%      42.3%       57.5%       41.4%
                    Proportional allocation     50.7%      49.7%       56.0%       54.1%
                    method
                    Pareto method               60.7%      63.4%       64.8%       45.3%
                    Pareto method combined      53.4%      52.5%       59.3%       50.8%
                    with hurdle method

                  4.  Conclusions and next steps
                      The  work  done  on  the  macro-micro  linkage  of  household  wealth  has
                  established a linkage between the two statistics covering most financial and
                  non-financial balance sheet items. Methodologies created to account for the
                  wealth of rich households severely underreported in survey data has enabled
                  the production of experimental distributional national accounts indicators.
                      The EG LMM has recognised needs for further development in the area.
                  First, the coverage of non-financial assets in national accounts should as much
                  as possible delineate dwellings and land underlying dwellings from other non-
                  financial  assets  and  land  not-underlying  dwellings,  as  well  as  exclude  the
                  holdings of NPISHs. Second, a drawback of the HFCS is that business wealth is
                  a net concept, and current data does not allow a separation between financial
                  assets, non-financial assets and liabilities of such businesses. Third, current
                  comparisons do not include all instruments in FA balance sheets. To cover the
                  entire balance sheet estimation methods for the remaining assets would need
                  to be created. Finally, the possibility to use administrative data sources should
                  be  continuously  pursued.  These  data  sources  are  vital  particularly  in  the
                  estimation of wealth held by rich households.



                                                                    109 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125