Page 136 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 136

STS523 Shazura Z. A. et al.
                  expedited, thus, enabling REs to pro-actively reach out to the beneficiaries,
                  who  are  unaware  of  the  insurance  policy/takaful  certificate  of  deceased
                  holders.  This  improves  the  confidence  of  policy/certificate  holders  on  the
                  trustworthiness  of  insurance  and  takaful  industry  in  Malaysia.  Hence,
                  policy/certificate holders can be assured that their inheritance are in good
                  hands and will be distributed to the rightful beneficiaries upon death.
                      Nevertheless, there are risks associated with the implementation of TIDeS,
                  due  to  the  possibility  of  occurrences  of  incorrect  death  status  in  JPN’s
                  Registration of Death, arising from the declaration of death by court for a
                  missing person and the registration of death for a deceased accident victim
                  using stolen NRIC. The Bank may wrongly disseminate information to the REs,
                  given that a person who is alive is reported as deceased by JPN. This is in
                  addition to reputational risks involving the credibility and professionalism of
                  the Bank. To mitigate the risks associated to this, the Bank through the policy
                  issuance  on  Data  Checking  Arrangement  with  JPN  –  Guidance  on  Data
                  Submission  dated  12  April  2019,  requires  REs  to  establish  a  framework
                  providing  for  an  appropriate  communication  strategy  in  approaching  the
                  beneficiaries of a deceased policy/certificate holder given the sensitivity of the
                  information  relating  to  the  death  status  and  also  the  possibility  of  any
                  inaccurate death status of such policy/certificate holder. REs also must not rely
                  solely on the death status obtained from the Bank and should conduct their
                  own  due  diligence  to  confirm  the  accuracy  of  the  death  status  of  a
                  policy/certificate holder after obtaining such status under this arrangement
                  and  before  making  any  communication  with  the  beneficiaries  of  such
                  policy/certificate holder.

                  2.1.1 Updating the 12-digit NRIC Number of Customers of REs
                      The benefits of leveraging on the alternative data sources have proven to
                  be a value-add to increase the data quality at the Bank. In the Bank’s attempt
                  to further enhance data quality of statistical reporting by the REs in parallel
                  with the request by the REs for the Bank’s assistance via Financial Institutions
                                            1
                  Steering  Committee  (FISC )  to  obtain  the  12-digit  NRIC  numbers  of  their
                  borrowers and accountholders from the Bank or directly from JPN, the Bank
                  in early 2019 has embarked on a one-off exercise in updating the 12-digit
                  NRIC number of customers of REs, who initially registered their identification
                  (ID) number using the non-12-digit NRIC number while performing financial
                  transactions with the REs.
                      This one-off exercise requires the REs to submit information on the names
                  and old Individual NRIC/Army ID/Police ID/birth certificate numbers of their



                  1  FISC is a high-level oversight committee and communication platform between the industry
                  and the Bank.


                                                                     125 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141