Page 173 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 173

STS538 Pedro Luis do N. S. et al.
            only provides weights for products commercialized in brick-and-mortar stores
            and those need to be used as proxies for products traded via web. For the
            2017 - 2018 HBS being finalized, questions on the kind of store (online or
            offline)  where  purchases  were  performed  were  introduced.  With  such
            information more details on the web shopping process will be known and
            derivation of weights for online shopping might be possible.
                Another issue stems from the fact that ‘location’ of the web site hosts, the
            location from where the consumer orders the goods, and the delivery address
            for  the  goods  may  all  be  different,  and  therefore  there  would  need  to be
            decisions  regarding  to  which  region  the  particular  transaction  should  be
            allocated, given our approach to build the national CPI from aggregation of
            regional  indices.  In  addition,  though  prices  offered  online  often  have  no
            distinction according to different regions of the country, different delivery fees
            apply depending on delivery address, and such fees may also depend on the
            amount of goods purchased, thus making it difficult to associate a proper price
            for a single good. Level and evolution of prices at web and brick-and-mortar
            stores are not necessarily the same, though in a recent study [Cavallo, 2017]
            found no evidence of price discrimination between online and offline prices
            for big retailer chains, with an observation of ≈ 5% difference in Brazil.
                In Brazil, only about 75% of the households have some form of internet
            access [IBGE, 2018]. The average velocity of internet connection in Brazil is
            three times lower than the global aver-age and the access is much lower for
            rural households. However, internet access is growing fast due to the use of
            mobile devices and promoting an important increase of e-commerce in Brazil.
            According to a recent report [ebit, 2019], 7 out of 10 Brazilians owned a mobile
            phone in 2018, an increase of 7% over 2017. This increase is strongly correlated
            with the enhancement of the e-commerce observed in 2018, 12% larger in
            volume of sales than those observed in 2017 [ebit, 2019]. In 2018, 58 million
            Brazilians (27% of  the country’s  population)  performed at least one online
            purchase. Of these, 10 million performed their first online purchase in 2018,
            64% of which by means of a mobile phone. The growth in the volume of sales
            of the m-commerce in 2018 over 2017 was 41%, amounting to ≈ 42% of the
            volume of e-commerce sales in 2018 [ebit, 2019]. The number of online orders
            was 123 million in 2018 (increase of 11% over 2017), however this led to a
            modest average of ≈ 2 purchases a year for the online buyers in 2018, mostly
            concentrated  in  sectors  like  make-up,  and  clothing  and  accessories  which
            respond to ≈ 40% of the orders.
                Given the peculiarities of the e-commerce in Brazil discussed above, the
            adoption  of  web  data  for  the  NSCPI  should  proceed  with  caution.  IBGE  is
            experimenting  a  parsimonious  introduction  of  web  data  to  improve  CPI
            compilation in combination with traditional sources. The first approach that
            IBGE is experimenting with involves web scraping for prices of products where

                                                               162 |I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178