Page 117 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 4
P. 117

STS570 Nadim Ahmad et al.
            level, with a subsequent provision of data on the national parts of the MNEs
            to  the  countries;  and  (ii)  a  bottom-up  approach  according  to  which  each
            country  collects  data  on  the  national  parts  of  the  MNEs,  which  are
            subsequently  exchanged  and  verified  across  countries.  Given  current
            circumstances,  both  ways  forward  require  a  paradigm  shift  in  allowing  for
            international exchange of individual data within the statistical community and,
            in  the  case  of  the  top-down  approach,  in  collecting  statistical  data  and
            compiling national accounts data. One possible step would be the re-use of
            the data that will become available from the OECD Base Erosion and Profit
            Shifting (BEPS) initiative. See http://www.oecd.org/ctp/aggressive/beps-2015-
            final-reports.htm. Action 13 of this initiative requires MNEs to provide much
            more detailed country-by-country reporting on their worldwide business, with
            more detailed information requested for large MNEs. But it remains unclear
            whether this data becomes available for statistical purposes as well.
                19. In this paper, options for an alternative recording of MNE-activities
            have been put forward. Although one might wish for a world in which national
            accounts fit into traditional narratives about domestic production using capital
            and labour, the way forward involves recognising that the world has become
            more complex. While one can supplement the current international standards
            to help in the analysis of a globalised economy, in the long term it is necessary
            to  adapt  our  data  collection  and  compilation  strategies  to  come  up  with
            innovative ways to measure global entities that are engaged in production
            that is not limited by national boundaries.

            References
            1.  N. Ahmad and J. Ribarsky. 2014. Trade in Value Added, Jobs and
                Investment, Paper Prepared for the 33rd General Conference of the
                IARIW (Rotterdam, August 24-30, 2014). Available at:
                http://www.iariw.org/papers/2014/AhmadPaper.pdf
            2.  J. Bruner, D.G. Rassier, and K.J. Ruhl. 2018. Multinational Profit Shifting
                and Measures throughout Economic Accounts, NBER Working Paper No.
                24915. Cambridge (USA). Available at:
                https://www.nber.org/papers/w24915.pdf.
            3.  M. de Haan, and J. Haynes. 2018. R&D Capitalisation: Where Did We Go
                Wrong?, EURONA 1/2018. Luxembourg. Available at:
                https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/system/files/euronaissue1-2018-
                article1.pdf.
            4.  R. Lipsey. 2010. Measuring the Location of Production in a World of
                Intangible Productive Assets, FDI and Intrafirm Trade, The Review of
                Income and Wealth, Volume 56: S99-S110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-
                4991.2010.00385.x.
            5.  B.R. Moulton, and P. van de Ven. 2018. Addressing the Challenges of
                Globalization in National Accounts, Paper prepared for CRIW Conference

                                                               106 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122