Page 63 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 1
P. 63

CPS877 Paula J.G. et al.
                The trajectories of Ireland, Greece, Portugal, and Spain (Figure 4) were of
            particular interest given the bail-out programs and associated restructuring
            plans  plus  austerity  measures  implemented  in  these  countries  during  the
            course of the study period (in addition to the initial stimulus packages adopted
            by the OECD countries after 2008). The trajectories were complemented by an
            analysis of the variables’ variation in each country to appreciate the impact
            and extent of the local government and European measures and policies. In
            the case of Ireland, there was a trajectory inflection from 2010 onwards mainly
            based  on  the  favorable  movement  of  variables  as  labor  insecurity,
            unemployment,  house  expenses,  working  long-hours,  and  secondary
            education. At the same time, Greece and Spain presented long trajectories
            with  inflections  from  2014  resulting  from  favorable  employment,
            unemployment,  working  long-hours,  secondary  education,  and  water
            satisfaction (in Greece) plus household income, employment, labor insecurity,
            unemployment,  water  satisfaction,  and  feeling  safe  (in  Spain).  Although
            Portugal also benefited from a bail-out program, the country trajectory was
            much  shorter  and  presented  an  inflection  from  2013  onwards  which  was
            mainly due to favorable (but limited) movements in relation to employment,
            labor insecurity, unemployment, house expenses, secondary education, and
            feeling safe.

            4.  Discussion and Conclusion
                Although  the  OECD  “How’s  Life”  datasets  were  not  complete  for  all
            member and partner countries nor the entire set of variables, it was possible
            to select 34 countries and 15 variables over a period of seven years with a
            reduced number of data gaps. The global analysis of the datasets permitted
            to detect a Guttman effect in the evolution of the OECD countries given the
            general progress (with a stagnation phase from 2011 to 2013)  in terms of
            quality and conditions of life over time (axis 1). At the same time, there was a
            significant decline in relation to essential aspects (due to the volatility of the
            variables associated to the individual, family, and government budgets) until
            2012 but the general recovery afterward permitted to exceed the 2009 levels
            by 2015 (axis 2).
                In this context, the STATIS interstructure revealed not only the existence of
            a common structure for the objects representing the annual data tables, but
            also a sequential evolution with a good representation of the years. However,
            it was insightful to notice the contrasting interstructure opposition of the years
            2009-2011 relative to 2012-2015. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients of
            the compromise principal components and the initial variables permitted to
            interpret the meaning of the axes based on the variables’ oppositions. So, axis
            1 relates to the social quality and conditions of life while axis 2 is associated
            with the dependency on the wealth circumstances at an individual level.

                                                                52 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68