Page 221 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 3
P. 221

CPS1999 Pranesh K. et al.
            to represent data which is fuzzy and this fuzziness can be represented by the
            degree of participation to a set called a membership function. Let X  be a space
            of  points.  A  fuzzy  set    in  space  X    is  characterized  by  a  membership
            function,   (),  and  the  value  of   ()  at  x  representing  the  grade  of
                                                 
                       
            membership of x  in A where  :  → [, ].  For traditional bivalent logic, the
                                          
            value of membership function of crisp data can only be 0 or 1, that means,
            outside the set, or within the set, respectively. However, a fuzzy set allows for
            its members to have degrees between 0 and 1. Thus, it can explain natural
            phenomenon  more  accurately.  Further,  conventional  set  theory  and  binary
            logic have three elementary binary operations, that is, intersection (and), union
            (or),  and  complement  set  (negation).  The  rules  of  binary  operations  were
            generalized in order to fitting fuzzy data. The fuzzy logic operations truth table
            is shown in Table 1. The generalized form of the operators works well for the
            fuzzy and for the bivalent data as well.

                       Table 1: The Generalized form of operations; Truth table
                                                      min(, )
                                                        max(, )
                                                          1 − 

            2.  Methodology
                The classical linear regression has  crisp coefficients and is bounded by
            some strict assumptions about the given data, that is, the unobserved error
            terms are mutually independent and identically distributed. However, if the
            data set is too small in size, or, if there is difficulty in verifying that the errors
            are normally distributed, or, if there is vagueness in the relationship between
            the dependent and independent variables, or, if there is ambiguity associated
            with the events, it is well known that the classical linear regression may fail to
            work satisfactorily. In such cases, alternatively, fuzzy linear regression may be
            more  useful.  Fuzzy  linear  regression  (FLR)  was  first  introduced  by  Tanaka
            (1982) and then further developed in Tanaka (1987). The FLR model includes
            a fuzzy output and non-fuzzy input variables and fuzzy coefficients. In this
            paper, however, our focus is on the type of fuzzy regression model considered
            by Tanaka (1987). The basic model assumes a fuzzy linear functional form

            ̃ =  +   + ⋯ +   ,                                          (1)
                      ̃
                                  ̃
                 ̃
                       1 1
                  0
                                    

            where  = [ ,  , … ,  ] is a vector of input variables,  = [ ,  , … ,  ] is a
                                                                        ̃
                                                                                 ̃
                                                                           ̃
                                                                  ̃


                                                                        0
                                                                           1
                                                                                 
                         1
                            2
                                  
            vector of fuzzy coefficients presented in the form of symmetric triangular fuzzy
            data denoted by  = ( ,  ) with its membership function described as
                             ̃
                                    
                                      
                              
                                                               210 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226