Page 342 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7
P. 342

CPS2120 Grażyna Trzpiot et al.
               Scenario #3: Portfolio return rate 60/40:
                                            2
                      RpGERMANY = 0.51F2     R  = 0.3
               The  interpretation  of  this  equation  for  Germany  is  as  follows:  if  risk
               represented by F2 increase by 1, then Rp will increase by 0.51%.
                      RpSPAIN = − 0.21F1 + 0.063F2 + 0.95F3     R  = 0.94
                                                               2
               The interpretation for this result is as follows: if risk represented by F1 increase
               by 1, then Rp will decrease by 0.21% , if risk represented by F2 increase by 1,
               then Rp will increase by 0.063%, if risk represented by F3 increase by 1, then
               Rp will increase by 0.95%.
                                                               2
                      RpPOLAND = − 0.76F1 + 0.56F2 − 0.18F3     R  = 0.93
               The interpretation for this result is as follows: if risk represented by F1 increase
               by 1, then Rp will decrease by 0.76%, if risk represented by F2 increase by 1,
               then Rp will increase by 0.56%, if risk represented by F3 increase by 1, then Rp
               will decrease by 0.18%.

               4.  Discussion and Conclusion
                   There  is  statistically  significant  effect  extracted  by  PCA  risk  factors  on
               investment returns. In Germany we can point out three factors: wealth risk,
               systematic  longevity  risk  and  financial  market  risk  that  impact  statistically
               significant effect on each portfolio returns – czy to jest potrzebne bo w każdym
               zdaniu  tak  jest,  I  nie  widać  różnic  między  krajami.  In  Spain  we  have  three
               different factors: long-term standard of living risk, local economy risk, financial
               market  risk  which  impact  statistically  significant  effect  on  each  portfolio
               returns.  At  the  end,  for  Poland  we  receive:  demo-economic  risk,  financial
               market risk, individual wealth risk which have statistically significant effect on
               each  portfolio  returns.  Calibrated  models  are  acceptable,  statistically
               significant so we can use these models for prediction return of portfolio. The
               best quality of estimated models we obtain for Spain and Poland, the worst
               for Germany.
                   The effect of large long-term investors on both their investments and on
               the  markets  generally  has  prompted
a  key  debate  in  academic  literature.
               Presented results, we hope are in this important flow in age of aging.











                                                                  329 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347