Page 116 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 116

CPS2210 Justyna Majewska et al.
                  Lee (2005) noted that a model with the highest value of ER signifies the best
                  fit to the data. The lowest MAE and MAPE indicate for a better fit to historical
                  data as well.
                                    Table 1. In-sample goodness-of-fit measures
                                           LC for each country separately   Two-population models
                   Explanation ratio       0.8538                     0.9251
                   Mean absolute error     0.0061                     0.0049
                   Mean absolute percentage   1.361                   1.054
                   error

                  4.  Discussion and Conclusion
                      We compared the two-population mortality model by Li and Lee (2005)
                  and  Lee-Carter  model  for  ech  country  independently.  We  notice  that  the
                  parameters  for  two-population  model  for  each  pair  of  populations  look
                  similar. There are some differences between the age-specific component in
                  model Poland-Lithuania and rest of models. As expected, all of the common
                  parameters behave similarly, which is an indication that the models capture
                  the common trend between Poland and other countries.
                      The historical period for in-sample fitting is ranged from the year 1950
                  until  the  year  2015.  The  results  in  Table  1  suggest  that  the  augmented
                  common  factor  model  shows  the  best  in-sample  error  performances  as
                  compared to the independent model.

                  References
                  1.  Booth, H., Hyndman, R.J., Tickle, L. & De Jong, P. (2006) Lee-Carter
                      mortality forecasting: A multi-country comparison of variants and
                      extensions. Demographic Research, 15: 289-310.
                  2.  Brouhns, N., Denuit, M., & Vermunt, J. (2002). A Poisson log-bilinear
                      regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables.
                      Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31(3), 373–393.

                  3.  Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D., & Dowd, K. (2006). A two-factor model for
                      stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: theory and calibration.
                      Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(4), 687–718.

                  4.  Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G. D., Epstein, D., Ong, A.,
                      & Balevich, I. (2009). A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality
                      models using data from England and Wales and the United States. North
                      American Actuarial Journal, 13(1), 1–35.
                  5.  Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G. D., Epstein, D., Ong, A.,
                      & Balevich, I. (2009). A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality
                      models using data from England and Wales and the United States. North
                      American Actuarial Journal, 13(1), 1–35.
                  6.  Currie, I. D., Durban, M., & Eilers, P. H. C. (2004). Smoothing and
                      forecasting mortality rates. Statistical Modelling, 4(4), 279–298.

                                                                     105 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121