Page 327 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6
P. 327

CPS1949 Khalid S.



                        Measure of multidimensional poverty Robustness
                                 of indices to weighting schemes
                                            Khalid Soudi
                               High Commission of Planning, Rabat, Morocco

            Abstract
            This paper analyzes the robustness of multidimensional poverty indexes by
            considering  various  weighting  schemes.  In  particular,  it  establishes
            comparison  between  three  approaches  for  measuring  multidimensional
            poverty,  namely:  fuzzy  logic  method,  Alkire  and  Foster  (AF)  method  and
            Bourguignon  &  Chakravarty  method.  By  combining  two  approaches:  A
            quantitative  approach  of  factor  analysis  and  a  qualitative  one  taking  into
            account the perception of deprivation by the poor, this paper develops an
            empirical approach to determine dimensions of multidimensional poverty. By
            referring to the analytical frame of capabilities as developed by A. Sen, a list
            of central and basic functioning was chosen. The results show that all poverty
            indices estimated by using the AF weighting scheme are significantly higher
            than those estimated using the other pre-determined normative weights. The
            stochastic  dominance  of  the  curves  of  poverty  allowed  us  to  confirm  the
            robustness  of  these  results.  Moreover,  if  the  items  of  deprivation  are  not
            structured  by  dimension,  the  results  show,  whatever  selected  weighting
            schemes,  an  overestimation  of  the  indices  of  multidimensional  poverty,  in
            particular those obtained through the AF weighting scheme. This pattern was
            consistent  for  all  weighting  schemes  and  impacts  both  the  headcount  of
            poverty as well as the multidimensional poverty index (MPI). The results of
            Bourguinon  and  Chakravarty  method  show  that,  whatever  is  the  adopted
            weighting  scheme,  the  indices  of  multidimensional  poverty  are  lower  than
            those  obtained  from  the  AF  approach.  The  differences  become  more
            important when adopting the weighting scheme suggested by AF. Besides, the
            differences observed become more pronounced if we don’t structure the items
            of  deprivation  by  dimension.  Also,  the  multidimensional  index  of  poverty
            obtained  according  to  fuzzy  logic  method  not  only  shows  an  important
            sensibility to the weighting design but also it remains widely lower than those
            obtained according to the approach A.F.

            Keywords
            weighting schemes; multidimensional poverty; robustness of indices.

            1. Introduction
               In  recent  years,  despite  the  many  methods  available  for  measuring
            multidimensional poverty, some important methodological problems remain
                                                               316 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332