Page 349 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 1
P. 349

IPS162 Pedro C. et al.
            4.  Discussion and Conclusion
                The continuous increase of dubious information in Online Social Networks
            (such as false information, biased news, and misleading statistics) is indeed
            concerning  as  it  affects  real-world  events  like  elections  and  other  policy-
            making  processes  which  critical  citizens  must  critically  make  sense  of  and
            evaluate. It is crucial, as stated by Weiland (2016), for critical citizens to be able
            to use that “statistical” power to influence, shape, and transform the socially
            constructed discourses and structures around them in order to create a more
            just  world.  Modern  methods  using  machine  and  deep  learning  and  fact-
            checking of claims recurring to external knowledge databases may help us
            getting empowered.
                Let  us  close  this  paper  by  quoting  Samuel  S.  Wilks,  who  in  his  1951
            presidential  address  to  the  American  Statistical  Association  paraphrased  a
            note, originally written by H. G. Wells in his 1903 book Mankind in the Making,
            in  a  shortened  and simplified  form: “Statistical thinking  will  one  day  be  as
            necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read and write.”

            References
            1.  AFP. (2003, December). Samarra clash toll still a mystery. News | Al
                 Jazeera. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from
                 https://www.aljazeera.com/archive/2003/12/200849131528113385.html
            2.  Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the
                 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2)211–236.
                 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
            3.  Benevenuto, F., Magno, G., Rodrigues, T., & Almeida, V. (2010). Detecting
                 Spammers on Twitter.Collaboration, Electronic Messaging, Anti-Abuse
                 and Spam Conference (CEAS 2010), 1–9.
            4.  Blauw, S. (2016). How to defend yourself against misleading statistics in
                 the news, TEDx Maastricht. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/mJ63-
                 bQc9Xg
            5.  Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., & Jajodia, S. (2012). Detecting
                 automation of Twitter accounts: Are you a human, bot, or cyborg? IEEE
                 Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 9(6), 811–824.
                 https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2012.75
            6.  Ciampaglia, G. L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L. M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F.,
                 & Flammini, A. (2015). Computational fact checking from
                 knowledge networks. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–13.
                 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128193
            7.  de la Merced, M. J., & Goldstein, M. (2018, January). Twitter Shares
                 Jump After Faked Bloomberg Report. The New York Times. The New
                 York Times. Retrieved from



                                                               338 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354