Page 320 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 320

IPS264 Oliver H. et al.
                  possible to replicate the actual tax system. This permits us to evaluate every
                  instrument  of  the  fiscal  welfare  state  (different  taxes  and  deductions)  with
                  regard to its impact on income inequality. We implement a Gini coefficient
                  based  decomposition  of  redistributive  effects  by  creating  counterfactual
                  “what-if” scenarios that allow us to analyze the effect of taxes if the deductions
                  under scrutiny are included or excluded. While the main contribution of this
                  paper is to shed light on the hidden component of the fiscal welfare state -
                  deductions - the tax data at hand additionally provides us the opportunity to
                  gain insight into the sometimes subtle changes of tax systems over time and
                  how  these  changes  affect  the  potential  redistributive  role  of  taxes.  These
                  insights  are  based  on  comparing  the  results  from  2011  to  those  of  2001.
                  During the intervening period, Switzerland experienced fierce tax competition
                  between the Swiss sub-states, the cantons, which resulted in financial relief for
                  high income earners.

                  2.  The hidden welfare state
                      Deductions can be seen as an instrument of the fiscal welfare state that
                  aims to provide tax relief to specific groups. The OECD (2010) distinguishes
                  between distinct kinds of tax relief that have to be judged differently from a
                  perspective of redistribution:
                        Tax exemptions: One possibility is to exclude incomes from taxation if
                         they fall below a certain threshold (e.g., incomes below the poverty
                         line).
                        Privileged tax rates: e.g. for single parents.
                        Tax credits: e.g. loss carryforward for self-employed persons.
                        Tax deductions: either related to certain expenses (e.g., interest costs)
                         or  standard  deductions  for  predefined  situations  (e.g.,  child
                         deductions).
                      Regarding the redistributive impact of tax deductions, one must bear in
                  mind that their effect on post-tax income inequality is not direct but indirect.
                  Deductions alter taxable income and tax rates, but the actual effect on the
                  post-tax  income  distribution  is  complex  and  depends  on  the  particular
                  constellation. Theoretically, three situations can be distinguished:
                        Deductions are made equally across all income groups. As tax rates are
                         usually  progressive,  a  flat  deduction,  however,  over-proportionally
                         favors high income filers, thus leading to an increase in inequality.
                        Deductions are more frequently used by high income filers. Therefore,
                         higher income taxpayers profit more and an increase in inequality is to
                         be expected.
                        Deductions are over-proportionally used by lower income filers. In this
                         situation, inequality can decrease if the tax relief effect outweighs the
                         effect of lowered tax rates.

                                                                     307 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325