Page 321 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 321

IPS264 Oliver H. et al.
                In summary, redistributive effects are highly dependent on the specific
            design  of  the  tax  and  deduction  system  as  well  as  the  pre-tax  income
            distribution,  emphasizing  the  need  for  empirical  studies.  To  our  best
            knowledge, there are only few studies that quantified the effect of deductions
            so far. Verbist & Figari (2013) showed that deductions are pro-poor in Finland,
            Germany,  Portugal,  Spain  and  Sweden.  In  Germany,  for  example,  the
            deductions are aimed at pensioners who are relatively more strongly located
            in  the  lower  part  of  the  distribution.  Deductions  are  rather  pro-rich  in
            Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK, where either private pension
            contributions  are  deducted  (Ireland,  UK)  or  mortgage  interest  tax  relief
            (Netherlands). While these studies provide first valuable insights on aggregate
            effects of deductions in different countries, our analysis complements these
            studies  with  detailed  information  on  various  types  of  deductions,  as
            Switzerland uses a fairly complex system with numerous different deductions.

            3.  Data
                As opposed to many other European countries where the levying of taxes
            is centralized, the tax system in Switzerland  mirrors the historically evolved
            federal structure, giving a  lot of  power to the sub-state levels, namely the
            cantons and municipalities (ESTV, 2013). A total of 26 tax laws exist, with each
            canton having its own tax law and the municipalities and the federal state also
            levying taxes. This results in a multitude of direct taxes on income and wealth,
            which assures that each level of the state can gather the needed revenue to
            provide public goods autonomously.
                The data we collected include all tax relevant information of the canton of
            Aargau and is available from 2001 to 2011. In 2011, Aargau was the fourth-
            largest canton of Switzerland with a population of 618’298 individuals that
            handed in 327’047 tax forms. With respect to economic inequality and mean
            income, Aargau is very close to the Swiss average. Furthermore, Aargau is also
            a good approximation to Switzerland with regard to its demographics and
            urbanity.  As  the  argument  of  the  present  paper  is  of  general  nature  and
            Aargau is not a special case within Switzerland, we assume our point to be
            valid for the whole of Switzerland as well.

            4.  Methodology
                Definition of incomes, taxes and deductions
               According to the federal structure of Switzerland, taxes are levied at three
            levels (federal, canton, and municipality). In addition, there is a church tax.
            Cantons, communities (also referred to as municipalities) and churches also
            levy taxes on wealth. Taxes are based on gross income, which includes all
            earned income, capital income and taxable social transfers. Before taxation,
            several different deductions can be made. Gross income minus deductions

                                                               308 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326