Page 438 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 438

IPS320 Michael Frosch
                     The possibility to organise the same ten different categories in two different
                  hierarchies recognises that the relationship between the level of authority and
                  level of economic risk is not always a direct positive relationship where a high
                  degree of economic risk also implies a high degree of authority or vice versa.
                  This might be the case for some categories. For example, employees have a
                  relatively low degree of authority (as dependent workers) while experiencing
                  a relatively low degree of economic risk (as workers in employment for pay).
                  Moreover,  own-account  workers  in  household  market  enterprises  have  a
                  higher degree of authority (as independent workers) and also a higher degree
                  of economic risk (as workers in employment for profit). However, for other
                  categories of workers there is an inverse relationship between authority and
                  risk. For example, owner-operators of corporations without employees have a
                  lower  economic  risk  but  a  higher  degree  of  authority  while  dependent
                  contractors have a higher economic risk but a lower degree of authority. In
                  practice, workers within these broad categories (as well as within the detailed
                  categories) experience greater or lesser degrees of authority and economic
                  risk and each of the two dimensions is rather a continuum than a dichotomy.
                  For conceptual purposes, combining the two  hierarchies (see figure 1) can
                  however,  contribute  to  a  general  understanding  of  the  varying  levels  of
                  authority and risk associated with the work relationship categories of ICSE-18
                  as  well  as  a  comparative  framework  to  understand  these  dimensions  for
                  different types of workers.

                                         Figure 3: ICSE-18 dual hierarchy


                                Workers in employment for pay    Workers in employment for profit
                                                              Employers in  household
                                Employers in                  market enterprises
                                corporations

                                Owner operators of  corporations    Own - account workers  in household
                                without employees             market enterprises without
                                                              employees

                                Permanent      Fixed - term
                                employees      employees      Dependent
                                                              contractors

                                Short - term and    Paid apprentices,    Contributing
                                casual employees    trainees and    family workers
                                               interns


                  3. Measurement of ICSE-18
                           th
                     The 20  ICLS resolution I provides some general recommendations for data
                  collection regarding data sources and frequencies of data collection. These
                  general  recommendations  are  not  sufficiently  detailed  to  give  countries

                                                                     425 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443