Page 67 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 1
P. 67

STS364 Elena Z. et al.
            of the sustainable development goals of the 2030 Agenda. For example, the
            ILO’s publication “Decent Work and the Sustainable Development Goals: A
            Guidebook  on  SDG  Labour  Market  Indicators"  states  that  “Many  of  these
            indicators are intrinsically related to others, which is why it is important to
            interpret them as a coherent set so as to paint a comprehensive picture. In
            many cases, interpreting a given labour market indicator along with others
            sheds light on patterns and helps to avoid misinterpretations” 2.
               The  trans-boundary  (between  separate  goals)  and  cross-boundary
            (between countries) effect of the mutual influence of SDG indicators is noted
            in  the  OECD  report  “Measuring  Distance  to  the  SDG  targets”3  [p.18].  The
            relevance of our research is confirmed by the fact that the said OECD report
            noted  that  “…  identification  of  synergies  and  trade-offs  for  many  of  SDG
            targets is an empirical question that has been little researched so far.” 3[p.20].
               As one of the few examples, we can give an estimate of paired correlation
            coefficients  between  the  SDG  indicator  values  in  the  study  “Achieving  a
            Sustainable Urban America” 4[p.18]. From the above publications, it becomes
            clear that the question of analysing the SDG indicators, taking into account
            their mutual influence and consistency with the real economic situation, is
            quite significant, but there are no methods for solving this yet. We offer an
            information base and methods for solving this problem on the example of the
            relationship  between  informal  employment  indicators  and  SDG  indicators,
            bearing  in  mind  that  informal  employment  is  a  “litmus”  of  the  level  of  a
            country's development and socio-economic situation in it.

            2.  Methodology
               a. Database
               The study was conducted by countries, the choice of which was determined,
            on  one  hand,  by  the  representativeness  of  these  countries  in  typological
            groups  by  level  of  economic  development  (according  to  the  World  Bank
            methodology), and on the other hand, by the availability of statistical data on
            all indicators used in the study.
               In the research economies are divided into four income groupings: low (LI),
            lower-middle  (MI),  uppermiddle  (UMI),  and  high  (HI).  Income  is  measured
            using gross national income (GNI) per capita, in U.S. dollars, converted from
                                                               1
            local currency using the World Bank Atlas method . This paper uses World
            Bank definition for 2018 fiscal year .
                                              2

            1  https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/378834-how-does-the-world-
            bank-classify-countries
            2  Following the World Bank definition, for the current 2018 fiscal year, low-income economies
            are defined as those with a gross national income (GNI) per capita, calculated using the World
            Bank Atlas method, of US$1,005 or less in 2016; lower middle-income economies are those
            with a GNI per capita between US$1,006 and US$3,955; upper middle-income economies are
                                                                56 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72