Page 167 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 2
P. 167

STS479 Nebil D. et al.
            numerical scores assigned by respondents to break the tie and identify the
            priority of the related SDG and/or target accordingly.
                The  methodology  for  the  identification  of  the  SDG  data  availability
            previously  carried  out  by  the  UNESCAP  [5]  has  been  adopted  and  data
            availability  of  the  SDG  indicators  have  been  examined  by  considering  two
            types indicator analyses:
               i.   Status of a situation at one point in time; and
              ii.   Describing the change in the status of situation as measured by an
                   indicator which requires a minimum of two data points.
                In  this  regard,  the  SDG  data  availability  analysis  in  this  paper  was
            conducted based on the following four criteria also adopted in the UNESCAP
            methodology:
               i.   Trend analysis possible (Trend OK): If a particular indicator has two or
                   more  data  points  available  for  50  per  cent  (or  more)  of  the  OIC
                   countries between 2000-2018;
              ii.   Only status analysis possible (Status OK): If a particular indicator has
                   only  one  data  point  available  for  50  per cent  (or  more)  of  the  OIC
                   countries between 2000 and 2018;
              iii.   Limited  status  analysis  possible  (Status  LIMITED):  If  a  particular
                   indicator has at least one data point available but for less than 50 per
                   cent of the OIC countries between 2000 and 2018; and
              iv.   No analysis possible (No Data): If no data points are available for any
                   of the OIC countries between 2000 and 2018.
                More details about the methodology can be also seen at [4].

            3.  Result
                Based on our analysis of SDG prioritisation, the respondent OIC countries
            prioritised the following eight SDGs as “High”:
                1.  SDG 1: No Poverty;
                2.  SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being;
                3.  SDG 2: Zero Hunger;
                4.  SDG 4: Quality Education;
                5.  SDG 5: Gender Equality;
                6.  SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth;
                7.  SDG 9: Industry, Innovation & Infrastructure; and
                8.  (SDG 13): Climate Action.
                As to the expected SDG achievement levels, only 1 respondent country
            (Iraq) stated that it would achieve SDGs 9 and 12-17 by 2020. On the other
            hand, 6 respondent countries envisage that they would achieve SDG 4 (Chad,
            Guinea, Iraq, Jordan, Sudan, and Yemen); 5 of them have the same hope for
            the achievement of SDG 2 (Bangladesh, Chad, Jordan, Palestine, and Sudan)
            by 2030. In addition, another group of 4 countries (Guinea, Indonesia, Jordan,

                                                               156 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172