Page 390 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 2
P. 390

STS507 Vince G. et al.
                  assessment of how government agencies use algorithms to analyse people’s
                  data, to ensure transparency and fairness in decisions that affect citizens.
                      The focus of the review was primarily social agencies using algorithms that
                  directly impacted people. The review consequently covered 14 agencies and
                  assessed algorithms against the GCDS’ and Privacy Commissioner’s Principles
                  for the safe and effective use of data and analytics.
                                                                   5

                  What did the review find?
                      The review found that agencies use a range of algorithms in their day to
                  day  operations  and  that  all  of  the  algorithms  described  by  agencies  are
                  embedded  in  policies  that  are  intended  to  deliver  public  benefit.  These
                  include:  improved  efficiency,  streamlining  processes,  proactively  targeting
                  specific support to individuals, supporting decisions, protecting New Zealand
                  from  risks  and  threats,  and  providing  assessment  or  forecasting  for  policy
                  development.
                      It also found there are opportunities to increase collaboration and sharing
                  of good practice across government to ensure that all of the information that
                  is published explains, in clear and simple terms, how algorithms are informing
                  decisions that affect people in significant ways.
                      In broad terms the nature of the conclusions was that agencies were acting
                  with the right sort of issues in mind but that they were acting separately. This
                  highlighted the risks of lines being drawn about ethical behaviour separately
                  across Government and the potential inefficiencies of agencies separately re-
                  inventing the wheel. In general, it reinforced the message of a competent but
                  siloed approach to data and analytics issues.
                      The  review  was  an  example  of  Stats  NZ  operating  outside  our  usual
                  mandate  as  a  producer  of  statistics.  It  demonstrates  that  there  are  direct
                  connections between the foundations elements of good  statistical practice
                  and a broader role of helping the New Zealand Government develop a well-
                  functioning data system.

                  4.  The Centrality of the Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI)
                      With cross government data initiatives, the issue generally arises how the
                  National Statistical Office can obtain leverage as it tries to engage agencies in
                  data issues. In New Zealand, apart from the explicit mandate provided by the
                  GCDS role, a critical aspect of acquiring leverage comes from how central the
                  IDI  has  become  to  how  Government  makes  investments  in  its  social
                  programmes.


                  5   Principles  for  the  safe  and  effective  use  of  and  analytics  https://www.privacy.org.nz/news-and-
                  publications/guidance-resources/principles-for-the-safe-and-effective-use-of-data-and-analytics-
                  guidance/
                                                                     379 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395