Page 319 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 319

STS547 John D. et al.
               2015; Statistics New Zealand, 2017). As part of this effort both countries are
               exploring  and  evaluating  new  methods  for  the  compilation  of  population
               estimates. While undertaken separately, there are similarities in the respective
               approaches.  Projects  in  both  countries  involve  first  creating  a  Statistical
               Population Dataset (SPD) to represent the population and then adjusting for
               coverage errors.
                   In  the  Irish  PECADO  project  (Population  Estimates  Compiled  from
               Administrative Data Only), the SPD is built using a Signs of Life (SoL) approach
               and as such by design does not suffer from overcoverage. Ireland does have
               an official person identification number (PIN) used across Public Services, and
               linkage based on this number eliminates linkage error. DSE methods are used
               to  adjust  for  undercoverage  using  a  separate  administrative  data  list.
               Reassurance  with  respect  to  the  non  existence  of  overcoverage  is  further
               provided  through  an  application  of  an  extension  of  DSE  methods  called
               Trimmed  Dual  System  Estimation  (TDSE).  The  TDSE  approach  was  first
               proposed by Zhang and Dunne (2018) and we will refer to this method as the
               Zhang and Dunne method.
                   Statistics New Zealand build their SPD using a rules based approach to
               determine if someone belongs to the population or not. The rules are typically
               based on activity on administrative sources in the two year period up to and
               including the reference period. In this context the SPD is expected to contain
               both  undercoverage  and  overcoverage  errors.  Statistics  New  Zealand have
               developed and are evaluating a methodology to adjust SPD counts to obtain
               population  estimates.  Their  approach  is  based  on  a  Bayesian  model  and
               requires  a  second  sample  to  be  undertaken  in  the  field.  The  approach  is
               proposed  by  Graham  and  Lin  (2019)  and  we  will  call  the  Graham  and  Lin
               method.
                   As  different  conditions  and  assumptions  underpin  each  approach  the
               methods are not directly comparable. However, we consider their different
               strengths and weaknesses. This short paper has two more sections. The next
               section describes the two methods and in the final section we consider their
               strengths and weaknesses.

               2.  Methods Illustrated
               2.1 The Irish PECADO Project - Zhang and Dunne Method
                   We  take  as  our  starting  point  the DSE  model  proposed  by  Zhang  and
               Dunne (2018), and following this approach we develop a DSE estimator for the
               population size as  = / where  is the size of list ,  is the size of list 
                                  ̂
               and   is  the  size  of  the  match  between  the  two  lists.  The  assumptions
               underpinning this DSE model are i) no erroneous records in either list  or list
               ; ii) no linkage error when matching records between list  and list  and iii)






                                                                  308 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324