Page 327 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 327

STS547 Maarten C. et al.
               in only one register (item missingness). The linked data are used to estimate
               the size of the population that is not present in either register, and for these
               unobserved records all the variables are missing (unit missingness). There is
               an extensive line of research that studies this problem from a missing data
               perspective, starting with Zwane and van der Heijden (2007), and summarized
               in  van  der  Heijden  et  al.  (2018).  The  latter  paper  concluded  that  further
               practical  experience  with  these  methods  is  needed  to  demonstrate  their
               usefulness in a variety of situations and encourage their wider application.
                   Here  we  consider  the  methods  for  estimating  the  size  of  the  Māori
               population  in  New  Zealand.  Ethnicity  is  the  principal  measure  of  cultural
               identity in New Zealand, and is used across the official statistics system. The
               2005 New Zealand statistical standard for ethnicity states that ethnicity is self-
               perceived and a person can belong to more than one ethnic group. Identifying
               the indigenous Māori population is of particular importance.
                   Ethnicity is regularly included in data collections because of its importance
               in  defining  groups  of  policy  interest,  for  example  on  health  outcomes  for
               indigenous  people  in  New  Zealand.  However,  differences  in  questions,
               differences in self-perception depending on the context, and changes over
               time, can all affect how ethnicity is recorded in these data sources (Statistics
               New  Zealand  2005).  Ethnicity  is  collected  independently  in  a  number  of
               administrative sources as well as through the census and household surveys.
               People do not always report the same ethnicity in each source. Also, people
               do  not  always  report  their  ethnicity,  so  there  is  an  additional  missingness
               problem to deal with.
                   Official population estimates and projections for major ethnic groups in
               New Zealand are based principally on the responses people provide in the five
               yearly census, adjusted for non-response using a post-enumeration survey. As
               part of its census transformation programme, Statistics NZ is exploring the
               feasibility of a census based on administrative data (Statistics New Zealand,
               2012, 2014). The ability to produce ethnicity data from administrative sources
               is a key consideration. Using ethnicity information from linked administrative
               data  sources  may  also  improve  the  current  production  of  official  ethnic
               population estimates.
                   The aim is to use ethnicity information from linked administrative data to
               improve official ethnic population estimates in New Zealand. In support of this
               we analyse a variety of census and administrative sources using the approach
               of Zwane and van der Heijden (2007), with a specific focus on the estimation
               of the size of the Māori population at the time of the 2013 population census.
               The  analysis  requires  the  extension  of  the  methods  to  deal  with  multiple
               registers  and  with  a  variety  of  different  types  of  missing  data.  The
               methodology falls within the area of data integration of multi-source statistics,
               see de Waal et al. (2017) and Zhang and Chambers (2018).




                                                                  316 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332