Page 51 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 51

STS515 Alison L. G. et al.
            in the future (Zheng, 2017). New fields of application are constantly emerging,
            dealing with increasingly complex data such as high-dimensional sequence or
            network  data,  and  generating  new  types  of  problems  that  statisticians are
            called  to  address.  This  shifting  landscape  makes  it  difficult  for  statistics
            educators  to  foresee  students’  needs,  let  alone  cater  to  them  through
            curricular reform, a typically slow and gradual process. Instead of trying to
            anticipate  every  development,  we  believe  our  programs  should  prepare
            students to be able to adapt to these changes on their own. We borrow the
            term  “adaptive  expertise”  from  the  fields  of  cognitive  development  and
            pedagogy to refer to such desired behaviour.
                The concept of adaptive expertise was introduced by Hatano & Inagaki
            (1986)  to  describe  the  ability  to  aptly  address  new  types  of  problems,  as
            opposed to routine expertise which is focused on efficiently solving familiar
            problems. It is closely related to the concept of transfer of learning, i.e. “the
            ability to extend what has been learned in one context to new contexts” (NRC,
            2000),  but  we  prefer  the  term  adaptive  expertise  as  it  encompasses  both
            knowledge and practice. We first look at a general framework for attaining
            adaptive  expertise,  one  that  also  offers  an  interesting  lens  on  Statistics
            Education, before going on to propose specific strategies.




















                  Figure 1. Trajectories to Adaptive Expertise through the Innovation-
                                          Efficiency space.

                Adaptive  expertise  calls  for  superior  performance  in  novel  situations,
            something  that  requires  domain-specific  proficiency  as  well  as  general
            inventiveness.  Schwartz,  Bransford,  &  Sears  (2005)  discuss  the  trade-offs
            involved in developing such skills with the help of a two-dimensional space of
            innovation  and  efficiency,  similar  to  the  one  presented  in  Figure  1.  They
            consider three possible trajectories to adaptive expertise: one which prioritizes
            efficiency, one which prioritizes innovation, and one which balances the two;
            they call the latter the “optimal adaptability corridor,” but we use the simpler
            term “integrated” trajectory. They observe that formal education has typically
                                                                40 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56