Page 14 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2
P. 14

CPS1407 D.Dilshanie Deepawansa et al.
                  new method called “Synthesis Method” developed earlier (see Deepawamsa
                  et al. 2018). The method combines the fuzzy set theory introduced by Cerioli
                  and Zani (1990) and further developed by Cheli and Lemmi (1995), Betti et al
                  (2005a,  2005b),  Chakravarty  (2006),  Betti  &  Verma  (2008),  Betti  et  al.
                  (1999,2002,2004), Belhadj (2012), and Verma, et al. (2017), and the counting
                  method introduced by Alkire and Santos (2010) followed by Alkire et al. (2015).
                  The Counting method is an axiomatic approach which has been empirically
                  implemented worldwide to calculate the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)
                  and provides a more flexible framework to produce MPI measures. In contrast,
                  the Synthesis method (Deepavansa et al. 2018) identifies the poor using the
                  Fuzzy  Membership  Function  and  aggregates  the  Fuzzy  Deprivation  Score
                  using the methods introduced by Alkire et al. (2015). The Fuzzy Deprivation
                  Score extends the methods developed by Foster, Greer and Thorbeck (1984)
                  to  compute  the  indices  denoting  deprivation  in  social  factors  that  in  turn
                  condition poverty.
                      The Fuzzy Membership Function is estimated as follows. If is the set of
                  elements such that  ∈ , then the fuzzy sub set     can be denoted as,
                               = {, ()}.                                               (1)

                      In this equation () is the membership function, (m.f) is a mapping from
                   → [0,1]. The value of  is the degree of membership in the incident of   in
                  . When   = 1  then  completely belongs to  . But if   = 0  then  does
                  not belong to . However, if the elements q is 0 < () < 1   then  partially
                  belongs to .  So the degree of q’s membership in the fuzzy set increases when
                  its propensity () is closer to 1.
                      Let the term n of the set of individuals (n; i=1 ……. n) be a sub set .  Then
                  the Fuzzy Set Approach describes the poor as follows:
                           i= 1,2……………. n.                                                                        (2)

                      The  value  of  the  membership  function  is  defined  by  the  following
                  equation.;
                      () = 1 if    0 ≤  < 
                                . −
                       () =          <  <                            (3)
                       
                               . − .
                      () = 0 if ≥ ,

                                              th
                                                             th
                      Where   is the value of i individual in j  indicator where (i=1,2……n) and
                  (j=1,2……k)  in  the  poor  set  .  Then  the  Membership  Function  for  each
                  individual is given by equation (4) which averages the membership scores of
                  all indicators to provide a fundamental product of the fuzzy set of poor of the
                  i  individual.
                   th



                                                                       3 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19