Page 246 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 3
P. 246

CPS2010 Rodrigo L. et al.
                  an index based on household characteristics, durables, and household heads’
                  education. Their results show declines in poverty during the nineties decade,
                  mainly due to advance achieved in rural areas. However, Sahn and Stifel (2003)
                  investigate urban-rural differences using several living standards indicators,
                  including an asset index, and find gaps that are not diminishing over time.
                  Finally, Booysen et al (2008) create an asset index to examine changes in seven
                  African  countries  and  conclude  that  progress  is  mainly  associated  to
                  accumulation of private assets, as compared to the setback in the access to
                  public services. This paper will close a gap in the literature by carrying out a
                  similar analysis for the Latin America region using census microdata.

                  2.  Methodology
                      This study uses census microdata from the IPUMS International project,
                  the largest repository of international census samples. Household wealth is
                  observed across the 1990, 2000, and 2010 census rounds. The data include 24
                  census  samples  from  10  countries,  which  cover  at  least  for  two  of  the
                  referenced  rounds.  The  following  censuses  are  employed  for  the  analysis:
                  Argentina 1991, 2001, and 2010, Bolivia 1992 and 2001, Brazil 1991, 2000, and
                  2010, Chile 1992 and 2002, Colombia 1993 and 2005, Ecuador 1990, 2001, and
                  2010, Paraguay 1992 and 2002, Peru 1993 and 2007, Uruguay 1996, 2006, and
                  2011, and Venezuela 1990 and 2001. The samples for each of these censuses
                  represent 5 to 10% of the country's population. The data provided by IPUMS
                  are  harmonized  (i.e.  it  uses  a  consistent  coding  structure  for  the  same
                  variables),  which  facilities  the  construction  of  indicators  and  enhances
                  comparability for the analysis.
                      Household  wealth  is  defined  using  dwelling  characteristics  and  human
                  capital.  We  identified  a  set  of  indicators  at  the  household  level  that  are
                  common  across  all  datasets.  The  choice  of  these  indicators  is  based  on
                  previous literature (Booysen et al, 2008; Lovaton et al, 2014; Sahn & Stifel,
                  2000) and it also follows some indicators comprised within the Sustainable
                  Development Goals (SDGs) framework. The calculation of indicators not only
                  uses  consistent  definitions  across  countries  and  census  rounds  to  achieve
                  higher comparability, but it is also based on harmonized microdata offered by
                  IPUMS.  The  set  of  nine  non-monetary  wealth  indicators  analyzed  are:  1)
                  whether the dwelling is owned or rented, 2) access to electricity, 3) access to
                  piped water, 4) connection to public sewage, 5) whether the dwelling has a
                  toilet or a bathroom, 6) finished floors, 7) cement, brick or concrete walls or
                  roof,  8)  number  of  persons  per  room,  and  9)  years  of  schooling  of  the
                  household head. A summary measure is produced to assess overall household
                  wealth  through  the  aggregation  of  these  nine  indicators.  This  measure  is
                  defined  as  a  linear  combination  of  the  indicator  variables  by  applying



                                                                     235 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251