Page 247 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 3
P. 247

CPS2010 Rodrigo L. et al.
            appropriate weights to each of them. If we consider weights wi and wealth
            indicators xi, the index is defined as:

                                 = ′ =   +   + ⋯ +  
                                              1 1
                                                     2 2
                                                                 9 9

                We  use  two  alternative  approaches  to  calculate  the  weights  for  this
            household wealth measure. First, we calculate the weights through principal
            component analysis (PCA). This data-reduction technique produces weights
            by  identifying  the  directions  of  larger  data  variability.  PCA  is  applied  to  a
            pooled dataset including all census samples, so that each indicator receives
            the same weights across countries and years (similar to Booysen et al, 2008,
            Sahn and Stifel, 2000). The household wealth index is then created from the
            first principal component of the data. Given the variance-covariance matrix of
            the data ∑, then PCA derives the weights wj from the following optimization
            problem:
                                      ( ) =  ∑
                                                          ′
                                                  ′

                                          ′ = 1

                Second, weights are also produced by estimating a model for household
            expenditures,  where  we  use  each  of  the  nine  indicators  as  explanatory
            variables.  For  this  purpose,  we  rely  on  household  surveys  that  are
            contemporary with the most recent census year as an additional data source,
            given that expenditures or income are rarely included in census microdata.
            Therefore, in order to carry out this analysis, the supplementary data source
            must include the same set of variables and household expenditures. Given
            household expenditures E, the weights wi are estimated using the regression
            equation  below.  The  household  wealth  index  corresponds  to  predicted
            expenditures using these estimated weights.

                                =  +   +   + ⋯ +   + 
                                                  2 2
                                     0
                                                             9 9
                                          1 1

                Based on each of these two alternative wealth indices, we examine changes
            in poverty. Two definitions of poverty are operationalized with the data. First,
            households are considered poor if they are at the bottom 40% of the wealth
            distribution,  based  on  the  pooled  data  for  a  specific  country.  Second,  we
            identify a set of minimum household characteristics that would be necessary
            to achieve a predicted expenditure equivalent to the poverty line used by the
            country. By using these two definitions, we identify whether poverty increased
            or decreased over time, and how it was spatially distributed.
                The spatial component of the analysis faces a major challenge posed by
            changes  in  administrative  boundaries  over  time.  Researchers  interested  in


                                                               236 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252