Page 111 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 5
P. 111

CPS1113 Madhu Mazumdar et al.
            or registries) often lack information on important confounders. This gap may
            be addressed by IV analysis. Here, IV analysis provided results comparable to
            multivariable regression and propensity score analysis. However, since the IV
            method also addresses unmeasured confounders, it is conceptually superior.
                IV  analysis  is  not  commonly  used  in  healthcare  delivery  research.
            Researchers  may  believe  that  identifying  an  IV  that  fulfills  all  three
            assumptions  is  difficult,  or  that  the  method  is  overly  complicated.  Both
            obstacles can be overcome by early collaboration with statistical collaborators.
            Moreover, statistician-collaborators can assist in examining IV assumptions via
            formal  statistical  tests  and  sensitivity  analyses, discussing  each  step  of the
            analysis with the study team. Indeed, our 2-stage analysis is no more complex
            than propensity score analyses. In conclusion, IV analysis may complement
            other analytic approaches for observational studies and thereby increase the
            overall value of such studies.
                For  this  retrospective  cohort  study  data  from  the  Premier  Healthcare
            Database10 (Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc., Charlotte, NC) was used. This
            database contains administrative claims data on approximately 20-25% of US
            hospital discharges. Records include International Classification of Disease-9th
            revision  (ICD-9)  codes,  Current  Procedural  Terminology  (CPT)  codes,  and
            complete inpatient billing items. Preparing analytic dataset with patient as unit
            using  these  codes  is  a  valid  way  to  perform  healthcare  delivery  research
            projects.

               Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients in the Instrumental Variable-
                                           derived cohort
                                                     Drain Use
                                          Yes (n=21,218)   No (n= 83,898)
                                            n       %       n        %     Standardized
                                                                           difference**
             PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS
             Median Age*                     70   (63, 76)    70   (63, 76)      0.0071
             Gender                                                              0.0056
                            Male           9,075   42.77   35,650    42.49
                            Female        12,143   57.23   48,248    57.51
             Race / Ethnicity                                                    0.0554
                            White         17,426   82.13   70,469    83.99
                            Black           975     4.60    3,579    4.27
                            Hispanic         89     0.42     432     0.51
                            Other          2,728   12.86    9,418    11.23
             HEALTHCARE-RELATED
             Insurance Type                                                      0.0435
                            Commercial     5,022   23.67   19,514    23.26
                            Medicaid        449     2.12    2,039    2.43
                            Medicare      14,554   68.59   58,259    69.44
                            Uninsured       118     0.56     331     0.39
                            Unknown        1,075    5.07    3,755    4.48

                                                               100 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116