Page 38 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 38

CPS2171 Rajkumari Latasana Devi et al.
                  # Source: Census of India, Sikkim, 2011
                  Using Spearman's rank correlation method, we get

                  r  = 1 -    6Σd²
                                n(n² - 1)
                  = 1 –  6*14
                            4 (4²-1)
                  = 1 –   84
                           4 (16-1)
                  = 1 –  84
                           4 * 15
                  = 1 -   84
                            60
                  = 1- 1.4
                  = - 0.40
                      From  the  above  calculation,  the  value  of  Spearman’s  Rank  Correlation
                  coefficient was found to be -0.40. The minus sign indicate the direction of the
                  relationship between literacy and sex ratio and the value 0.40 showed that the
                  strength of the relationship was low. It means that there were low negative
                  correlations between literacy and sex ratio in the state.  We can interpret in
                  another way that with the increase in literacy, the sex ratio decreases, or with
                  the decrease in literacy, the sex ratio increases. Both the two variables are of
                  opposite of each other. We can also say that both literacy and sex ratio has an
                  indirect correlation. Hence, from the above result we concluded that literacy
                  and  sex  ratio  had  a  low  negative  correlation  between  them  but  it  was
                  insignificant (r = - 0.40, P=0.60).

                  4.  Discussion
                     We know that Correlation measure the linear relationship between two or
                  more quantitative variables. Here, Spearman's rank correlation method was
                  applied by assigning ranks to the two variables: literacy rate and sex ratio.
                  Clearly, the coefficient of Correlations (r) was found to be negative and it was
                  0.40. This meant that literacy and sex ratio are opposite of each other. So, it is
                  a case of low degree of negative correlation. This shows that with the increase
                  in  literacy,  the  sex  ratio  decreases  or  decrease  in  literacy,  the  sex  ratio
                  increases. The finding of the present study revealed that literacy and sex ratio
                  were negatively correlated. But it was not statistically significant (P=0.60). A
                  study conducted in Gujarat concluded that there was negative correlation (-
                  0.52) between literacy and sex ratio in their study. In a study conducted in
                  Maharashtra to find out the relationship between literacy and sex ratio using
                  Spearmen’s Rank Correlation method revealed that the literacy and sex ratio
                  had positive but insignificant correlation in Maharashtra (r = 0.07). A study
                  conducted in Rajasthan also revealed that there was a negative correlation
                  between literacy and sex ratio in Rajasthan. The correlation between literacy
                                                                      27 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43