Page 376 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6

CPS1989 Yuan Zhenqiang et al.
The third level consists of 120 tertiary indicators, which mainly decompose
and interpret the primary and secondary indicators from the perspectives
of industry, region, urban and rural areas and categories, and give full
consideration to the reflection of Qingdao’s characteristics, so as to
facilitate further detailed analysis.

3. Evaluation Method
3.1 Target value evaluation method. Set up target value for every indicator
and compare it with actual value in report period. And then calculate the
realization degree of individual and graded indicators and finally get
corresponding evaluation value.
3.2 Efficacy coefficient evaluation method. Define threshold value for every
indicator (including satisfaction value and not-allowable value) taking
satisfaction value as the upper limit and not-allowable value as the lower
limit, and then calculate the realization degree of satisfaction value of every
indicator and accordingly determine their grades. Finally, the weighted
average is used for comprehensive evaluation and ranking.
3.3 Principal component analysis method. Use dimensionality reduction
method to transfer multiple indicators into a few of comprehensive ones
(i.e. principal component) which contain mutually non-repetitive
information and could reveal most of information of original variables.
While introducing various variables, the complex factors are reduced to
several principal components to simplify the problem and obtain more
scientific and effective results.
3.4 Comprehensive index evaluation method. According to the principle of
"average index method", the index of single indicator is calculated by
relative processing method first, and then the weighted average of single
index (or sectorial index) is formed to form comprehensive index.
3.5 Expert rating evaluation method. Invite several experts to score
evaluation objects and make comprehensive evaluation through back-to-
back method, and make an expected judgement on the future
development trend.

4. Method Selection
This research mainly selects the comprehensive index method and
records the changes of index to reflect high-quality development status.
Besides, we innovatively introduce contribution rate to measure the
contribution share of every sector, during which we collect relative data in
recent three years and individually calculate individual index,
comprehensive index and contribution rate taking 2015 as the base period.
Measurement procedures are as follows:
4.1 Treat as a measure of the same factors

365 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9