Page 378 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6

CPS1989 Yuan Zhenqiang et al.
‘K’refers to comprehensive index, I0 refers to index value in base period, I1
refers to index value in report period and ‘w’refers to weight.

3. Result
1. Evaluation Result
1.1 Evaluation Result Obtained through Comprehensive Index
As shown by the calculation result obtained in the way of comprehensive
index, we can see that the high-quality development index in Qingdao in
2016 is 105.9% compared with that in 2015, while in 2017 the index reaches
106.03%, rising 0.13 percentage point on a year-on-year basis, which reflects
a steady increase.
In light of category, the open development index reveals the highest level
and the biggest rising amplitude, which becomes the primary factor for
increasing the high-quality development index. Other indexes in 2017 ranked
from the highest to the lowest are green development index, innovative
development index, coordinated development index, shared development
index and development achievement index.
In regard of contribution rate, the highest is open development index
which also has the biggest increasing magnitude. Other indexes ranked from
the highest to the lowest by the contribution rate are green development
index, innovative development index, coordinated development index,
shared development index and development achievement index.

1.2 Evaluation Result Obtained Through Expert Rating
We invited experts from the Statistical Expert Consultation Committee to
additionally check the evaluation result obtained through comprehensive
index. These experts are from colleges, scientific research institutions and
large corporate groups of Qingdao and own high reputation in economic
and statistic research fields, so their evaluation results feature some degree
of authority and representativeness.
We carried out a questionnaire survey on ‘what level do you think the
high-quality development of Qingdao stands’. From the survey results, we
found that people choosing 70-80 points, 80-90 points and 90-100 points
respectively accounted for 61.1%, 38.9% and 0, and the comprehensive
evaluation point were 78.9. This means that high-quality development stands
in the lower overall-good level. The result from another survey about ‘how
did the high-quality development in Qingdao in recent three years change’
showed that people choosing increasing and impartial trend respectively
accounted for 22.2% and 77.8%. While collecting the survey result of ‘the
expectation over the future status of high-quality development in Qingdao’,
we found that people selecting increasing and impartial trend respectively

367 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9