Page 374 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6

CPS1989 Yuan Zhenqiang et al.
1.3 Comparability. Most of indicators we choose are relative. We should
give up the thought of just laying stress on the differences of absolute
amounts like the total number of economy, population scale and
geographic area. By doing so, we aim to make benchmarking analysis and
emphasize the quality and efficiency differences caused by unbalanced and
insufficient development.
1.4 Operability. We attempt to improve the availability of indicators and
focus on the publicity and authority of data sources. Data should be open
and continuous as far as possible to ensure the objectivity of evaluation
results.
1.5 Openness. The indicator system includes objective and subjective
indicators to reflect the dynamic and open nature of the evaluation. It not
only considers the common indicators in the fields of economic, social and
people’s livelihood, but gives consideration to the reflection of Qingdao’s
economic and social characteristics. We should base on current situation,
focus on long-term development and timely make appropriate adjustment,
supplement and improvement.

2. Basic Framework
The statistics indicator system of Qingdao high-quality development is built
based on the requirements of high-quality development and the new
development concept, in which macro and micro development quality and
efficiency are taken as the priorities. The indicator system is divided into
three levels. The first level is composed of 6 primary indicators, mainly
focusing on innovative development, coordinated development, green
development, open development, shared development and development
quality and efficiency. The second level is composed of 50 secondary
indicators, mainly reflecting specific matters of the primary indicators.
Meanwhile, by taking consideration of the requirements of nation,
provinces and targeted analysis, it sets up 6-12 secondary indicators under
the primary indicators to make further detailed explanation to them. The
basic framework is as follows:
2.1 Indicator group of innovative development. It mainly reveals the deep
integration of science and technology with economy, the ability of science
and technology to create a new economy, the ability of fostering new
growth drivers to speed up traditional industry upgrading, the situation of
the nationwide business startup and innovation drive. Besides, we need to
release new demands and create new supply. The group consists of seven
secondary indicators, including R&D funds, PCT international patent
application, investment of technological reform, strategic emerging
industry and added value of high-technology industry.

363 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9