Page 136 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 1
P. 136

IPS115 Reija H.

                  Table 1. Six key recommendations by ProCivicStat
                   #1    Statistics education activities should promote engagement with
                         social issues and develop leaner’s critical understanding.
                   #2    Use  relevant  data  and  texts,  and  highlight  the  multivariate,
                         dynamic and aggregated nature of social phenomena.
                   #3    Embrace  technologies  that  enable  rich  visualizations  and
                         interactions with data about relevant social phenomena.
                   #4    Teaching methods should develop skills of critical interpretation
                         of a wide variety of data and text sources.
                   #5    Assessments  should  examine  the  ability  to  investigate  and
                         critically understand data, statistics findings and messages about
                         key social phenomena.
                   #6    Promoting  the  understanding  of  civic  statistics  requires  a
                         systemic change and collaboration by relevant stakeholders.
                      Source: (ProCivicStat, 2018)

                      Media  sources  should  be  evaluated  based  on  valid  knowledge  –  not
                  feelings or beliefs. This is where statistics form an integral part. Sashi Sharma
                  outlines a few examples of where statistical literacy helps to make sense of the
                  news  media:  for  example,  sensational  news  headlines  (“Kids  who  watch
                  ‘Sesame Street’ do better in school” (Sharma, S. [2017]) that are often based
                  on  singular  studies,  with  small  sample  sizes,  confounding  variables  and
                  sampling error. Sharma puts it well: “Indeed, citizens without statistical literacy
                  may not be able to discriminate between credible and incredible information
                  and will have difficulty in interpreting, critically evaluating and communicating
                  reactions to such messages” (Sharma, S. [2017]).
                      There are several formal definitions of statistical literacy available (See Gal,
                  I.  [2002];  Schield,  M.  [2010];  Wallman,  K.  [1993]).  On  a  general  level,  the
                  “traditional” view to literacy (‘literacy leads to development’) differs greatly
                  from the new concept, which argues that literacy is rooted in social customs
                  and has a social meaning. Social literacy implies training those who want to
                  communicate something (UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. [2013]). In
                  recent years, ISLP has been concerned with responding to this more modern,
                  and broad, concept of literacy. The definition of the term ‘statistical literacy’
                  by  Gould,  R.  (2017)  reveals  the  demands  of  a  modern  society,  such  as
                  understanding issues of data privacy and ownership and the provenance of
                  data  and  understanding  how  data  are  stored  and  how  representations  in
                  computers can vary and why data must sometimes be altered before analysis.
                      Finally, statistical literacy leads us to the term data literacy. According to
                  the Oceans of Data Institute (2015): “The data literate individual understands,
                  explains  and  documents  the  utility  and  limitations  of  data  by  becoming  a

                                                                    125 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141