Page 376 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 1

IPS169 Markku L.
43. Power, M. 1999. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
44. Ràfols, I. 2019. S&T indicators in the wild: Contextualization and
participation for responsible metrics. Research Evaluation 28(1), 2019, 7–
22.
45. Rafols, I., Ciarli, T., van Zwanenberg, P. & Stirling, A. 2012. Towards
Indicators for `Opening Up' Science and Technology Policy. Presentation
at the conference. Internet, Politics, Policy 2012: Big Data, Big
Challenges? Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 20-21
September 2012.
46. Ràfols, I., Molas-Gallart, J., Chavarro, D.A. & Robinson-Garcia, N. 2016.
On the Dominance of Quantitative Evaluation in ‘Peripheral’ Countries:
Auditing Research with Technologies of Distance (May 28, 2016).
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2818335 or
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818335
47. Rosanvallon, P. 2017. Seminar presentation at the Institut des Etudes
Avancées, Paris,24 March.
48. Rothstein, B. & Stolle, D. (2008). The State and Social Capital: An
Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4),
441-459.
49. Santaoja, M., Laine, M. and Leino, H. (2016). “Joku palikka siitä puuttuu” –
luottamuksen rakentuminen täydennysrakentamisen suunnittelussa.
[“There’s a piece missing somewhere” – construction of trust in planning
in-fill construction] Yhdyskuntasuunnittelu 54(1). Available at:
http://www.yss.fi/journal/joku-palikka-siita-puuttuu-luottamuksen-
rakentuminen-taydennysrakentamisen-suunnittelussa/ (accessed 5
th
June 2018).
50. Sébastien, L. and T. Bauler (2013), ‘Use and influence of composite
indicators for sustainable development at the EU- level’, Ecological
Indicators, 35, 3‒12.
51. Shore, C. Wright, S. 2015. Governing by numbers: audit culture, rankings
and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23, 1: 22-28
52. Söderbaum, P. 1999. Values, ideology and politics in ecological
economics. Ecological Economics 28 () 161–170.
53. Stirling, A. 2008. ’Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation,
and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology
& Human Values, 33, 262-294.
54. Tait, M. 2011. Trust and the public interest in the micropolitics of
planning practice. Journal of planning education and research 31(2):
157-171.

365 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9