Page 287 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 287

IPS246 Tiziana Laureti et al.
            In this paper we present an application of uncertainty in measuring economic
            well-being at local level, a crucial aspect that impacts both the design  and
            evaluation of policies. We focus on the issue of measuring the accuracy of at
            risk of poverty rate (AROP) which is defined as the proportion of people with
            an equivalised total net income below 60% of the national median income and
            estimated  from  the  European  Union  Statistics  on  Income  and  Living
            Conditions (EU-SILC) surveys.  After reviewing the literature devoted to the
            computation of standard errors of traditional measures of monetary poverty
            and to the assessment of non-sampling errors, we estimate AROP standard
            errors  for  Italy  taking  into  account  the  complex  survey  design  and  using
            linearization methods. Moreover, we provide estimates of standard error of
            AROP at regional level (NUTS-2) by also using equivalised income adjusted for
            price differences in order to better inform policy making.  We use the 2017
            wave  of  EU-SILC  in  which  detailed  information  on  the  sample  design  are
            provided.

            Keywords
            Data uncertainty; well-being; poverty measures

            1.  Introduction
                Despite  the seminal  studies  of  Kuznets (1948)  and  Morgenstern (1950)
            addressing  the  issue  of  uncertainties  in  economic  statistics,  the
            communication  of  data  uncertainty  is  still  a  widely  neglected  problem.
            National Statistical Offices (NSOs) and other statistical agencies often publish
            official  economic  statistics  as  point  estimates  making  little  mention  of
            uncertainty in the reported estimates. However, pretending an accuracy that
            is unrealistic may lead us to a misinterpretation of the statistical results and
            erroneous  conclusions  by  the  users.  As  Manski  (2019)  underlined,  point
            estimates may be viewed as true but are not necessarily true. Thus, in the
            absence  of  agency  guidance,  some  users  of  official  statistics  may  simply
            assume  that  errors  are  small  and  inconsequential.  Contrastingly,  users  of
            official  statistics  who  understand  that  statistics  are  subject  to  error  may
            conjecture the error magnitudes, thus misinterpreting the information that the
            statistics provide.
                Therefore,  in  late  2018  Eurostat  launched  the  COMUNIKOS  project
            (COMmunicating UNcertainty in Key Official Statistics) which aims to conduct
            an  in-depth  methodological  and  empirical  evaluation  of  a  number  of
            alternative approaches to measuring and communicating uncertainty as well
            to  propose  new  methods  and  metrics  to  measure  and  communicate
            uncertainties for official statistics.





                                                               274 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292