Page 214 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 1
P. 214

STS425 Nur I. et al.
                          This  process  will  be  repeated  for  some  different  predetermined  K
                      regimes implemented to MSw(K). Finally, the most representative models
                      with an optimal number of regimes for the data will be selected using the
                      smallest AIC ((Frühwirth-Schnatter, 2006) and (Chuffart, 2015)).
                          When the EM is running, the first step analysis in a Markov process can
                      always happen in regime  =  at the following (t+1)-th. It can happen
                                                
                      when the process for the first time leaving from the regime  = , i.e.
                                                                                    
                      when  =0 and  =1 is assigned to be  (+1)  = 1 and  (+1) =0 (Huang,
                             
                                       
                      et. al.,2013). Calculating a run length of regime  = , therefore, can be
                                                                      
                      done by counting the length of serial time t , when  =1 before it is set
                                                                          
                                = 0  for   = 1,2, … , .  When  the  EM  process  has  met  the
                      to   (+)
                      convergence, each latent variable     ,    {1,2, … , } will have the series
                                                             
                      value, 0 and 1 for the length of . The length of 1’s series for regime  =
                                                                                          
                       represents its run length during the associated period. Furthermore, the
                      distribution  of  run  length,  especially  ARL,  for  each  regime  can  be
                      empirically determined by using its run-length distribution.

                  3.  Results
                      The increasing price of both shares does not seem linear from day to day
                  transaction. Both trends tend to decline at the end of the recording period
                  which the Dicky Fuller test is said not to reject the null hypothesis. This non-
                  linear  price  change  shows  the  AALI  shareholders  scooped  up  share  prices
                  doubled almost 75 times, while for SSMS shareholders only doubled almost
                  3.5 times.
                      Simplification for easier analysis, differencing on lag 1 to both serial data
                  shares has to be done. Dicky Fuller's test rejects the null hypothesis to the new
                  both data. The serial plot data coupled with their marginal plot are shown in
                  Figure 1. Their leptokurtic and fat tail would be impossible to be represented
                  as a uni-modal normal distribution. Changes in variance during the transaction
                  make  the  preliminary  testing  using  the  Wolfram  Mathworld  chi-square  in
                  Mathematica software report that there is still a small difference in mean and
                  even variance. It is meant that there is a multi-modal pattern and showing that
                  there are structural changes in the model (Weisstein, 2019).
















                                                                     203 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219