Page 400 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 2
P. 400

STS507 Katherine Jenny T. et al.
                  slowly, with the acquisition of a processing environment and historical data
                  sets.  Subject  matter  experts  extracted  the  EC  test  data  from  industries
                  provided by the classification experts. They also provided classification rules
                  for donor records (whose values can be used for imputation) and recipient
                  records (need an imputed value), thus ensuring that industry-specific “must-
                  product”  rules  would  be  enforced  by  any  imputation  method.  The
                  classification  experts  provided  industries  whose  product  distributions  were
                  expected to remain largely the same under NAPCS.  Even so, the historical
                  product data were not expected to be perfect predictors of the 2017 product
                  data due to numerous collection changes from the 2012 EC.

                  Table 1: Research Components
                   Component          Purpose                                Leaders
                   Test         Data     Find  test  data  with  comparable  Subject   Matter
                   Preparation   and      products under 2012 EC and NAPCS   and
                   Knowledge             Define donors/recipients           Classification
                   Sharing               Bring  staff  “up  to  speed”  on  data  Experts
                                          collections
                   Exploratory   Data     Understand the “nature” of reported  Methodologists
                   Analysis  (Empirical   data  to  assess  potential  imputation
                   Data)                  methods
                                         Understand  the  “nature”  of  missing
                                          data  to  assess  potential  imputation
                                          cells  and  to  develop  response
                                          propensity models
                   Evaluation Study      Evaluate   the   performance   of  Methodologists
                                          considered imputation methods over
                                          repeated samples

                      The team agreed to study only broad products and to limit the analyses to
                  national-level industry estimates. Broad products can be collected in different
                  industries, although many industry classification procedures rely on specific
                  product  categories.  Detailed  products  are  industry-specific  breakdowns  of
                  these produces and are not necessarily requested for all broad products. Broad
                  and detailed products comprise nested one-dimensional balance complexes.
                  The broad product values within a given establishment are expected to sum
                  to  the  total  receipts  value  reported  earlier  in  the  questionnaire.  Detailed
                  product values are expected to sum to their associated broad product value.
                  Additionally, a particular detailed product is associated with only one broad
                  product. Missingness tends to be higher with detailed products than broad
                  products.
                      It is not easy to develop viable imputation models for products.  Auxiliary
                  product data are not readily available. Moreover, other predictors such as total


                                                                     389 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405