Page 16 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 16

STS513 Wilma A. G. et al.
                  contributes  to  the  identification  of  the  provincial  and  municipal-level
                  indicators  that  will  operationalize  and  contribute  to  the  attainment  of  the
                  goals and outcome areas in the PDP and SDGs.
                  C. Localization of the Philippine SDG Indicator Framework
                     Given lot of progress that have been achieve in monitoring the SDGs, the
                  Philippines is still faced with challenges particularly on the monitoring of the
                  Philippine SDGIs at the local level.
                     The  localization  of  an  indicator  framework  is  not  new  to  the  statistical
                  community  however,  the  process  adopted  for  the  localization,  which
                  facilitated  the  linking  of  the  Philippine  SDG  indicators  to  the  national
                  development plan, regional development plans and local development plans
                  may  be  considered  as  revolutionized  since  local  government  units  were
                  involved  in  the  discussion  and  the  SDGs  were  integrated  in  the  local
                  development plans.
                     As a result of the regional and provincial consultations and assessments
                  on the SDGs, the PSA came up with Core Regional SDG indicators (CoRe-
                  SDGIs),  which  are  consistent  with  the  Initial  List  of  the  Philippine  SDG
                  Indicators. The Core-SDGI was defined as the minimum set of SDG indicators
                  for  sub-national  compilation  and  dissemination  to  facilitate  sub-national
                  comparisons to help monitor the achievement of the SDGs.
                     In order for an indicator to be included in the CoRe-SDGIs, at least one of
                  the  criteria  must  be  met,  which  includes  the  following:  (1)  it  must  be
                  consistently tagged as Tier 1 in all regions, (2) the indicator must be identified
                  available at the regional level during the national multi-sectoral workshops
                  and must have available baseline data in SDG watch, (3) it must be classified
                  as Tier 1 in at least 70% of the regions based on their submitted assessment
                  matrices, and (4) the data source of the indicator is known to have regional
                  disaggregation.  These  lists  underwent  review  and  was  endorsed  by  the
                  Regional Statistics Committees (RSCs)
                     Further, as a response to the enormous challenge brought about by the
                  localization  of  the  SDGs,  the  PSA  together  with  the  DILG  and  PSRTI
                  collaborated in the SDG localization initiative, which presented a distinctively
                  new  approach  in  the  development  of  an  indicator  framework  for  its
                  monitoring as it reached beyond the usual borders of the PSS and brought in
                  new voices such as the development planners from the local government units
                  and data partners in the discussion, recognizing their roles not only in the
                  monitoring but more importantly in the realization of the SDGs.
                     The localization mapping resulted to the mapping of the indicators that
                  are available in the Regional Development Plan and Provincial Development
                  Plan Results Matrices. Further, the list of SDG indicators that are common to
                  most of the municipalities were identified.


                                                                       5 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21