Page 190 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3

STS539 Muhammad Abid et al.
practitioners in order to detect earlier shifts when the characteristic of interest
does not follow the normal distribution.

References
1. Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured
product. Bells labs Techn J 9(2):364–389
2. Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41: 100–115
3. Roberts SW (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving
averages. Technometrics 1(3):239–250
4. Lucas JM, Crosier RB (1982) Fast initial response for CUSUM quality
control schemes. Technometrics 24:199–205 18.
5. Lucas JM, Saccucci MS (1990) Exponentially weighted moving average
control schemes properties and enhancement. Technometrics 32(1):23–
26
6. Abbas N, Riaz M, Does RJMM (2012) Mixed exponentially weighted
moving average control CUSUM-charts for process monitoring. Qual
Reliab Eng Int 29(3):345–356
7. Zaman B, Riaz M, Abbas N, Does RJMM (2015) Mixed cumulative sum-
exponentially weighted moving average control charts: an efficient way
of monitoring process location. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(8):1407–1421
8. Abid M, Nazir HZ, Tahir M, Lin Z (2017) An efficient nonparametric
EWMA Wilcoxon signed-rank chart for monitoring location. Qual Reliab
Eng Int 33(3): 669-685.
9. Abid M, Nazir HZ, Tahir M, Riaz M (2018) On designing a new cumulative
sum Wilcoxon signed for monitoring process location. PLOS ONE 13(4):
e0195762
10. Abbas N (2019) Homogeneously weighted moving average control chart
with an application in substrate manufacturing process. Comp Indust
Eng 120(6): 460-470.
11. Yang SF, Cheng SW (2011) A new nonparametric CUSUM sign control
charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int 27(7):867–875
12. Hunter JS (1986). The exponentially weighted moving average. J Qual
Techn 18: 203–210

179 |I S I W S C 2 0 1 9