Page 172 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 4
P. 172

STS579 Elena Yarovaya


                  where



                      The case of weekly supercritical BRWs with a few branching sources of
                  various intensities is quite complicated. That is why below we consider the case
                  of  one  source  of  branching,  that  is,    =  1 .  If    =  1  and  the  spectrum
                   (ℋ ) of the operator ℋ  1  contains for β1 ↓ βc a leading eigenvalue λ0(β1) →
                   
                        1
                  0, the asymptotic behavior of λ0(β1), as β1 ↓ βc, see (Yarovaya, 2017c), has the
                  following form.
                  Theorem 4 Under Condition (3) the eigenvalue λ0(β) of the operator   for β
                                                                                      
                  ↓ βc has the following asymptotic behavior:

                                          2
                         (i)    λ0(β) ~ c1β for d = 1,
                         (ii)   λ0(β) ~ e −c2/β  for d = 2,
                                                2
                         (iii)   λ0(β) ~ c3(β − βc) for d = 3,
                                                            −1
                                                   −1
                         (iv)   λ0(β) ~ c4(β − βc) ln ((β − βc) ) for   =  4,
                         (v)    λ0(β) ~ cd(β − βc) for   ≥  5,
                  where  ,   ∈  , are some positive constants.
                         
                  Theorem 5 Under Condition (4) the eigenvalue λ0(β) of the operator   for β
                                                                                      
                  ↓ βc has the following asymptotic behavior:

                         (i)    λ0(β) ~ cd,α(Nβ) α/α−1     =  1,   ∈ (1,2),
                         (ii)   λ0(β) ~ e −cd,α/(Nβ)     =  1,   =  1,
                         (iii)   λ0(β) ~ cd,α(β − βc)  α/d-a     =  1,   ∈ (1/2, 1)    =  2,   ∈
                                 (1,2)     =  3,   ∈ (3/2, 2),
                         (iv)   λ0(β) ~ e W(−cd,α(β−βc))     = 1,   =  21    =  2,   =  1   =
                                 3,   =  3/2,
                         (v)    λ0(β) ~ cd,α(β− βc)    =  1,   ∈ (0, 1/2)    =  2,   ∈
                                 (0,1)   =  3,   ∈ (0, 3/2 )    ≥  4,   ∈ (0,2),

                  where  ,  is some positive constant (for each fixed values of the parameter α
                  and  dimension  d  of  the  lattice ℤ ),  and () is  the  lower  branch  of  the
                                                    
                  Lambert W -function satisfying the condition () → −∞ for x ↑ 0.

                     Based on (Yarovaya, 2007), for   =  1 and 0 > 0c we get that equations (5)
                  have the form
                                                                                           (6)

                  where






                                                                     161 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177