Page 233 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 4
P. 233

STS582 Mariza de A.


























            Figure  2:  DAG  for  the  effect  of  circulating  levels  of  C-reactive  protein  on  insulin  resistance
            determined using CRP as an instrumental variable. XRP, c-Reactive protein genetic variant, the
            IV; E: CRP, circulating c-reactive protein levels, the modifiable exposure of interest; Y: HOMA-R,
            homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, the outcome of interest; M: (unmeasured
            or measured with error) confounders.

                The  three  assumptions  are  sufficient  for  the  simple  case  of  statistical
            testing,  i.e.,  using  genotype  as  an  IV  to  test  the  null  hypothesis  that  the
            modifiable exposure X is not associated with outcome Y. To avoid incorrect
            inference due to type II errors, the usual aim of MR studies is to provide an
            estimate of effect with reliable confidence intervals (7). Additional assumptions
            are  needed  to  estimate  a  causal  effect  with  IV  analysis,  i.e.,  one  should
            assumed the following:
                4.  All of the associations depicted in Figure 1 are linear and unaffected
                    by statistical interactions. (8)
                This  assumption  is  problematic  for  binary  outcomes  since  the  effect
            estimates are represented as an odds ratio or risk ratio. In the case the one
            needs to estimate causal effects using IV methods using linear associations
            and a continuous outcome Y, the IV estimate of the regression coefficient for
                                                    ̂
                                                        ̂
                                                                    ̂
            the effect of exposure (E) on Y is  ̂   =  /  , where   is the coefficient
                                                         
                                                    
                                                                    
            for the regression of outcome (Y) on the IV (Z), and   is the coefficient for
                                                                ̂
                                                                 
            the regression of exposure (X) on the IV.
                The IV estimator       provides  an  estimate  of  the  causal  effect  of
                                 ̂
                                  
            exposure  on  outcome,  even  in  the  presence  of  mediators  of  the
            exposure=outcome  association.  Several  methods  of  IV  estimation  are
            available where more than one IV and the outcome Y is a numerical variable
            and  associations  between  variables  are  linear.  The  most  common  used
            estimator is the two-stage least squares (2SLS) where can be derived by first
            perform the least-squares regression of the exposure X on the IV(s) Z; then
                                                               222 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238