Page 161 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 1
P. 161

CPS1239 Valerie M.B. et al.
            and not all statistical offices  adjust appropriately; (ii)  “free”  goods, such as
            Facebook, Wikipedia, pictures from a phone, etc., are not included in national
            accounts (because their price is zero), thereby underestimating the value they
            contribute to GDP. If these platforms are used for e-commerce, for example
            (which  is  very  common  in  developing  Asia),  their  contribution  to  efficient
            distribution is not properly accounted for; (iii) goods or services produced but
            not remunerated (unpaid household work, family help) are also not included
            because they are free; (iv) when corporations splinter production offshore, the
            valuation of each of the stages of production sometimes relies on inaccurate
            pricing by multinational companies, who declare their ownership of each stage
            of production in the locality that minimizes their tax liability (transfer pricing).
            Even if all production stages could be accurately valued, it would require all
            countries  providing  full,  accurate  reporting  and  sharing  their  data  on
            companies with other national accounts statistics offices, which is beyond the
            capacity of most countries’ institutions (Moulton and van de Ven 2018); and
            (v) the spillover effects from agglomeration economies of a  talented team
            working together to produce new knowledge is crucial to productivity and
            generally not accounted for. The human capital of a university scientist in the
            team, for example, is classified as  an “education”  service. Such a  service is
            valued  at  cost—sometimes  subsidized  if  provided  by  the  public  sector—
            because there is no tangible output.

            2.  Methodology and evidence using input-output data
                The ADB Multi-Regional Input-Output Table (MRIOT) allow us to measure
            sector-level  components  of  servicification  using  some  refinements  on  the
            well-known  direct  and  Leontief  coefficients.  Using  the  technical  coefficient
            matrix, we can quantify the number of services that are directly used as inputs
            in  manufacturing  sectors  for  arm’s-length  transactions.  By  subtracting  this
            matrix from the Leontief matrix, we also obtain an estimate of services that are
            indirectly used by a particular sector (see ADB (2018) for a detailed description
            of the decomposition). The Leontief coefficients themselves give us the total
            number of services used in manufacturing. In other words, they represent the
            sum of what we denote as direct and indirect components. To illustrate these
            concepts, consider the case of an automobile manufacturer. To produce one
            vehicle, it uses equipment leased by another company. The rent paid for the
            equipment is an example of a direct service used as an input by the automobile
            manufacturer. However, this does not account for all the equipment rentals
            that are paid in the production of one vehicle. For instance, the automobile
            manufacturer may require basic metals as part of its raw materials. Assuming
            these metals are also produced using leased equipment, then the rent serves
            as an indirect input to the manufacture of a vehicle. Figure 8 shows that the
            direct contribution of services to manufacturing’s value added between 2000

                                                               150 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166