Page 319 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2
P. 319

CPS1873 Ferenc M. et al.
                    tests  following  this  simpler  protocol  and  the  minority  with  proper
                    cognitive questionnaire testing;
                 6.  further  improving  cognitive  interviewing  methodology  focusing  on
                    interviewees with poor ability to reflexive thinking.
            The ideal solution depends on the characteristics of a given survey, on the
            profile and potential resources of the research institute as well as on the
            surrounding social-cultural conditions

            References
            1.  Beatty, P. C. & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research Synthesis: The Practice of
                 Cognitive Interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287-311.
            2.  Blair, J., Conrad, F., Ackermann, A. C. & Claxton, G. (2006). The Effect of
                 Sample Size on Cognitive Interview Findings. Presentation delivered at
                 the annual meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion
                 Research. Montreal, Canada.
                 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/208f/7cf2ad491e7a40a48a2d6564e3cb
                 3b40fe74.pdf Accessed on. 02. 01. 2019
            3.  Blair, J. & Conrad, F. G. (2011). Sample Size for Cognitive Interview
                 Pretesting. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 636-658.
            4.  Collins, D. (ed.) (2015a). Cognitive Interviewing Practice, London: SAGE
                 Publications.
            5.  Földvári M., Dorkó N., Mújdricza F. (2018). A HKÉF 2017-es kérdőívének
                 komplex tesztelése és értékelése. Záróriport [The Complex Testing and
                 Evaluation of the 2017 Questionnaire of the HBLS. Final Report].
                 Internally used document within the HCSO. Budapest, Hungary.
            6.  Földvári M. & Mújdricza F. (2018). A kognitív kérdőívtesztelés
                 módszertana: A kognitív interjúfelvétel [Cognitive Questionnaire Testing
                 Methodology: The Cognitive Interview]. Statisztikai Szemle, 96(5), 449-
                 467.
            7.  Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory:
                 Strategies for Qualitative Research, New Brunswick & London:
                 AldineTransaction.
            8.  Gray, M. (2015). Conducting Cognitive Interviews. Cognitive Interviewing
                 Practice, Ed. D. Collins, pp. 126-141. London: SAGE Publications.
            9.  Methodological Guidelines and Description of EU-SILC Target Variables,
                 2018 operation (Version August 2017), European Comission, EUROSTAT,
                 Directorate F: Social Statistics, Unit F-4: Quality of Life.
            10.  Miller, K., Willson, S., Chepp, V. & Padilla, J-L. (2014). Cognitive
                 Interviewing Methodology, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley&Sons.
            11.  Mújdricza F. (2018), A kognitív kérdőívtesztelés módszertana:
                 Mintaválasztás és toborzás [Cognitive Questionnaire Testing



                                                               308 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324