Page 151 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 3
P. 151

CPS1973 Matúš M. et al.
            •  the robustness property of the conditional quantile estimation is proved
                with respect to outlying observations and heavy tailed distributions (for
                instance, Cauchy distribution);
            Due to the strict page limitation all theoretical assumptions, technical details
            and complete proofs can be found in Maciak and Mizera (2016), Ciuperca and
            Maciak (2018) and Maciak and Mizera (2019).

            4.   Discussion and Conclusion
                Similarly as standard LASSO approaches the proposed methodology does
            not yield the oracle properties. Indeed, different values of the regularization
            parameter    >  0  in  (3)  are  needed  to  achieve  the  consistency  of  the
                         
            changepoint detection or the consistency of the model estimation. From the
            empirical point of view, various techniques can be used to improve the finite
            sample properties especially for small sample sizes (for instance, de-biasing,
            relaxed  LASSO,  or  two-stage  estimation).  However,  the  proposed
            methodology can effectively deal with changepoint detection and estimation
            problem within nonparametric regression setups and it is especially suitable
            for  situations  where  no  prior  knowledge  on  any  changepoint  structure  is
            known in advance. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is proposed to
            closely  investigate  finite  sample  properties  and  various  model  selection
            options.  The  overall  suitability  of  the  proposed  regularized  changepoint
            detection  in  nonparametric  models  is  also  illustrated  on  some  practical
            examples.

            References
            1.  Antoch, J., Gregoire, G., and Huˇskov´a M. (2006), “Test for Continuity of
                 Regression Function.” Journal for Statistical Planning and Inference 137,
                 753 – 777.
            2.  Antoch, J. and Jaruˇskov´a, D. (2013), “Testing for Multiple Change-
                 points.” Journal of Computational Statistics 28, 2161 – 2183.
            3.  Aue, A., Hotv´ath, L., Huˇskov´a M. and Kokoszka, P. (2008), “Testing for
                 Changes in Polynomial Regression.” Bernoulli, Volume 13, No.3, 637 –
                 660.
            4.  Ciuperca, G. and Maciak, M. (2018), “Change-point detection in a linear
                 model by adaptive fused quantile method.” Scandinavian Journal of
                 Statistic, (submitted).
            5.  Cs¨org¨o, M., and Hotv´ath, L. (1997), “Limit Theorems in Change-Point
                 Analysis.” Wiley Series in Probability & Statistics, Chichester, England.
            6.  Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I. and Tibshirani, R. (2004), “Least Angle
                 Regression.” The Annals of Statistics, 32, No.2, 407 – 499.




                                                               140 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156