Page 81 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 3
P. 81

CPS1947 Hsein K. et al.
            premium  (which  is  1.52%).  The  confidence  interval  is  constructed  by  the
            procedure  described  in  Section  3.  The  sample  period  is  1952:Q1  through
            2017:Q4.
                As  an  illustration  of  the  nonlinear  predictability,  consider  the  pair  of
            quarterly  lty  and  tbl  with  the  cointegrating  relation ̂ −1  = 0.674 −1   −
             0.739 −1  shown in Figure 2. The average quarterly equity risk premium in
            the post-1952 sample is 1.52 percent. The predicted value of quarterly equity
            premium, ̂(̂ −1 ), exceeds this 1.52 percent beginning at ̂ −1  = 0.0038 and
            then  peaks  at  3.39  percent  at ̂ −1  =  0.0147.  This  peak  occurs  in  the  first
            quarter of 2016 when the annualized long-term yield is 2.43% and 3-month T-
            bill rate is 0.23%.
                Panel A in Table 1 shows that the pair of baa and aaa gives the largest
            quarterly   in the full sample and this pair explains 8 percent of the variation
                      ̅
                       2
            in next quarter equity premium. As in previous empirical studies, we document
            in  Table  1  small   statistics  but  they  can  signal  economically  significant
                              ̅
                               2
            predictability, as explained in Campbell and Thompson (2008) and Fama and
            French (1988).

            4.   Conclusion
                This paper considers a semi-parametric single index predictive model with
            cointegrated predictors. We apply our model to study the predictability of U.S.
            stock  returns.  We  provide  new  evidence  that  quarterly  stock  returns  are
            predictable using the following pairs of cointegrated predictors: earning-price
            ratio and dividend-price ratio; 3-month T-bill rate and long-term yield; baa
            and aaa rated corporate bond yields; and dividend-price ratio and dividend
            yield using data over the 1927-2017 period and the post-1952 period.

            References
            1.  Campbell,  J.  Y.  and  Yogo,  M.  (2006),  `Efficient  tests  of  stock  return
                predictability', Journal of Financial Economics 81(1), 27-60.
            2.  Cochrane, J. H. (2011), `Presidential address: Discount rates', The Journal of
                Finance 66(4), 1047-1108.
            3.  Dong, C., Gao, J. and Tjostheim, D. (2016), `Estimation for single-index and
                partially  linear  singleindex  integrated  models',  The  Annals  of  Statistics
                44(1), 425-453.
            4.  Fama, E. F. and French, K. R. (1989), `Business conditions and expected
                returns on stocks and bonds', Journal of Financial Economics 25(1), 23-49.
            5.  Gao,  J.,  Tong,  H.  and  Wol_,  R.  (2002),  `Model  specification  tests  in
                nonparametric  stochastic  regression  models',  Journal  of  Multivariate
                Analysis 83(2), 324-359.
            6.  Kasparis, I., Andreou, E. and Phillips, P. C. (2015), `Nonparametric predictive
                regression', Journal of Econometrics 185(2), 468-494.

                                                                70 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86