Page 186 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 186

CPS2169 Carmen D. Tekwe et al.
                  intercept  for  the  nested  effects  of  teachers  within  schools  was  statistically
                  significant (p=0.04).

                  Results from LRM
                     The LRM summarizes the high dimensional measures of SDEE per subject
                  to  a  scalar-valued  measure.  This  summary  scalar-valued  measures  were
                  obtained  by  computing  the  arithmetic  mean  of  all  measures  of  SDEE  by
                  subject.

















                  Figure 2. Density plot of BMI distribution 18 months post baseline (Figure 2a) and density plot
                  of the baseline covariates adjusted residuals (Figure 2b). The skewness of the distribution of the
                  BMI outcome and the adjusted residuals are outlined in the two plots.

                     From the LRM results, we concluded that mean SDEE was not statistically
                  predictive of BMI at 18 months post-baseline ($\widehat{\beta}_{1} = 0.03$,
                  95% CI: -0.00, 0.06, p=0.064). Thus, application of the LRM indicated that the
                  overall mean energy expenditure obtained at baseline could not be used as a
                  predictor of future values of the conditional mean of BMI after adjusting for
                  the socio-demographic covariates (p=0.064). The LRM produced an AIC of -
                  396.6. While the use of overall mean SDEE to represent patterns of school day
                  physical activity behaviour results in loss of information, functional regression
                  models  correct  for  this  loss  of  information  by  using  the  full  profile  of  the
                  function-valued covariate in the estimation process.

                  Results from FLRM
                     Energy expenditure measures obtained at baseline were summarized using
                  four  basis  functions.  The  final  number  of  basis  functions  were  selected by
                  comparing the AIC values from the FLRM under varying number for the basis
                  functions. The computed AIC values ranged between -392.2 and -384.9, with
                  the  lowest  value  of  -392.2  achieved  with  four  basis  functions.  The  basis
                  functions were subsequently used as explanatory variables for SDEE in fitting
                  the  FLRM.  Once  the  model  was  fitted,  SDEE  was  considered  statistically
                  significant when all estimated coefficients of the basis functions yielded small


                                                                     175 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191